Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3741 - 3750 of 64430 for records/1000.

State v. Frank Starich
admitted into evidence and made part of the record….” This court rejects his arguments for four reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3041 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Julie counters that the record shows that the No. 2014AP243 3 court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144517 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
The dispositive issue on appeal is whether Highway B is a recorded, laid out highway and is, therefore, four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52619 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
court’s refusal to grant him access to the victim’s privileged treatment and therapy records, argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109735 - 2014-04-01

State v. Gary Brown
to obtain and introduce certain medical records that would have bolstered his credibility and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11092 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 13-08 - Comments from the Wisconsin State Bar
that, in this case, the clerk’s incomplete stamping was ‘beyond the control’ of the State. To repeat, the record
/supreme/docs/1308commentsstatebar.pdf - 2013-12-02

Wi App 127 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP6 Complete Title of...
. § 973.015 (2011-12)[1] to expunge the record related to a Kenosha County ordinance violation for which she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129267 - 2014-12-18

State v. Charles W. Randle
the totality of the record, we conclude that Randle’s plea, in conjunction with a plea agreement incorporating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2202 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Charles W. Randle
. We affirm the conviction because, under the totality of the record, we conclude that Randle’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2202 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of Slocum’s motions to “correct the record,” and whether the court properly dismissed Slocum’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162724 - 2017-09-21