Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3741 - 3750 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 3741 - 3750 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Jay R. Lellman v. Annette Mott
Lellman contends that the trial court adopted an incorrect methodology in determining his net annual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10464 - 2017-09-20
Lellman contends that the trial court adopted an incorrect methodology in determining his net annual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10464 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
for violation of Ordinance no. 106-1, disorderly conduct. At a municipal court trial held on February 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27591 - 2014-09-15
for violation of Ordinance no. 106-1, disorderly conduct. At a municipal court trial held on February 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27591 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that the trial court, when faced with unambiguous dissent to the verdict during jury polling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656581 - 2023-05-16
conclude that the trial court, when faced with unambiguous dissent to the verdict during jury polling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656581 - 2023-05-16
State v. Dennis L. Steele
postconviction motion for a new trial. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to submit the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13267 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion for a new trial. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to submit the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13267 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
awarding Dr. Marc J. Ackerman $1855.61[2] in attorney fees based on the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46257 - 2010-01-25
awarding Dr. Marc J. Ackerman $1855.61[2] in attorney fees based on the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46257 - 2010-01-25
COURT OF APPEALS
, and that, as a result, the jury was improperly instructed at trial, entitling him to a new trial. Alternatively, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40739 - 2009-09-15
, and that, as a result, the jury was improperly instructed at trial, entitling him to a new trial. Alternatively, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40739 - 2009-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
accident resulting in death. The trial court imposed a twenty-two-year term of imprisonment, bifurcated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138499 - 2017-09-21
accident resulting in death. The trial court imposed a twenty-two-year term of imprisonment, bifurcated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138499 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jack Williams
a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for first-degree intentional homicide party to a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9559 - 2017-09-19
a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for first-degree intentional homicide party to a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9559 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
), 939.63, and 941.29(2) (2007-08).[1] He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55089 - 2010-10-04
), 939.63, and 941.29(2) (2007-08).[1] He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55089 - 2010-10-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
).1 He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55089 - 2014-09-15
).1 He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55089 - 2014-09-15