Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37421 - 37430 of 69399 for as he.
Search results 37421 - 37430 of 69399 for as he.
CA Blank Order
U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that he had been deprived of his property without due process.[2] McCulloch
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134435 - 2015-02-02
U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that he had been deprived of his property without due process.[2] McCulloch
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134435 - 2015-02-02
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
credit for the time he spent in custody between April and November 2010. Tucker, through appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93596 - 2014-09-15
credit for the time he spent in custody between April and November 2010. Tucker, through appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93596 - 2014-09-15
State v. Lavell D. Love
] However, the police told Love that they believed he had been lying in his prior interviews and they also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26085 - 2006-08-02
] However, the police told Love that they believed he had been lying in his prior interviews and they also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26085 - 2006-08-02
Charles R. Lutz v. Washburn County
in 1936, when his family purchased a home on the adjoining lot. He testified as follows: THE COURT: You
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13471 - 2005-03-31
in 1936, when his family purchased a home on the adjoining lot. He testified as follows: THE COURT: You
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13471 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
defense counsel if he wanted to see the report. He did, but a copy was not available in the courtroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34362 - 2008-10-20
defense counsel if he wanted to see the report. He did, but a copy was not available in the courtroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34362 - 2008-10-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to file a response; he has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111770 - 2017-09-21
right to file a response; he has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111770 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Paul Evers v. Everett Fryer
. The relevant facts are undisputed. On March 28, 1994, Evers gave Fryer thirty days written notice that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8851 - 2017-09-19
. The relevant facts are undisputed. On March 28, 1994, Evers gave Fryer thirty days written notice that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8851 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of an intoxicant as a second offense. He challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54713 - 2010-09-22
of an intoxicant as a second offense. He challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54713 - 2010-09-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a new factor. Landis contends that he was entitled to a hearing on his motion, and alternately asks
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107548 - 2017-09-21
a new factor. Landis contends that he was entitled to a hearing on his motion, and alternately asks
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107548 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. BACKGROUND ¶2 McCoy concedes that he violated three county ordinances by excavating and constructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65643 - 2014-09-15
. BACKGROUND ¶2 McCoy concedes that he violated three county ordinances by excavating and constructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65643 - 2014-09-15