Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37431 - 37440 of 69155 for he.

State v. Randy W. Larson
was improperly enhanced based upon his status as a repeat offender, but we conclude that he has waived this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14184 - 2005-03-31

State v. Eugene Stone
, the officer was asked whether he had an opinion as to whether the cocaine was “held for resale or personal use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2434 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael L. Murphy
plea, and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Murphy claims that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8574 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael L. Murphy
for postconviction relief. Murphy claims that he did not voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently plead guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8574 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] James L. Allen v. David H. Schwarz
decline to do so for two reasons. First, Allen acknowledges that he was informed of the proper procedure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8428 - 2017-09-19

State v. Rolando Balli
count his two prior Illinois drunk driving offenses even after he successfully completed court-ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7024 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael K. Brooks
not contest the jury’s finding that he and his accomplice robbed two women. The sole issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13201 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2009-10).[1] He also appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64065 - 2011-05-16

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald A. Hoffman
status. See SCR 31.01(5). He was admitted to the Louisiana Bar in 1969. The complaint filed
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20363 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Marathon County v. Eric P. Z.
of habitual truancy.1 He contends that an unexcused "tardy" is not an unexcused absence for the purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9197 - 2017-09-19