Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37431 - 37440 of 65178 for or b.
Search results 37431 - 37440 of 65178 for or b.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4. 8 Unpublished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789716 - 2024-04-16
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4. 8 Unpublished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789716 - 2024-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the child’s adoption after termination. (b) The age and health of the child, both at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114109 - 2017-09-21
of the child’s adoption after termination. (b) The age and health of the child, both at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114109 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)(b). Based on the squad car video and reasonable inferences from it, the circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187056 - 2017-09-21
)(b). Based on the squad car video and reasonable inferences from it, the circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187056 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
person during the consent search. Richardson contends: [B]eing approached by four police officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141601 - 2017-09-21
person during the consent search. Richardson contends: [B]eing approached by four police officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141601 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
under this subsection.”); and WIS. STAT. § 343.305(10)(b)2. (“for the first improper refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175017 - 2017-09-21
under this subsection.”); and WIS. STAT. § 343.305(10)(b)2. (“for the first improper refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175017 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the original counts to allow for the possibility of lifetime supervision under WIS. STAT. § 939.615(1)(b)1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040157 - 2025-11-19
of the original counts to allow for the possibility of lifetime supervision under WIS. STAT. § 939.615(1)(b)1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040157 - 2025-11-19
State v. Randall W. Edwards
the admissibility of this evidence. We agree. Rule 609(B) of the Federal Rules of Evidence generally bars
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11394 - 2005-03-31
the admissibility of this evidence. We agree. Rule 609(B) of the Federal Rules of Evidence generally bars
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11394 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shannan M. Nipple
intentionally caused bodily harm to M.N., contrary to § 948.03(2)(b), Stats., based on nine older bone fractures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13829 - 2005-03-31
intentionally caused bodily harm to M.N., contrary to § 948.03(2)(b), Stats., based on nine older bone fractures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13829 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gregory M. Sanders
no information as to the “veracity” and “basis of knowledge” of the citizen informant, and (b) it contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13814 - 2010-02-22
no information as to the “veracity” and “basis of knowledge” of the citizen informant, and (b) it contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13814 - 2010-02-22
State v. George Taylor
of four men from the panel. B. Substantial Probability Definition. ¶12 Taylor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13870 - 2005-03-31
of four men from the panel. B. Substantial Probability Definition. ¶12 Taylor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13870 - 2005-03-31