Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37431 - 37440 of 58531 for speedy trial.
Search results 37431 - 37440 of 58531 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a preliminary hearing in each case. The circuit court prioritized 2021CF116 for trial, which involved
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913870 - 2025-02-12
a preliminary hearing in each case. The circuit court prioritized 2021CF116 for trial, which involved
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913870 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
432, 442, 342 N.W.2d 410 (1984). The right to a jury trial is entirely statutory and therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219536 - 2018-09-26
432, 442, 342 N.W.2d 410 (1984). The right to a jury trial is entirely statutory and therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219536 - 2018-09-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an order denying his motion for reconsideration. He argues that the trial court’s failure to include its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133042 - 2017-09-21
an order denying his motion for reconsideration. He argues that the trial court’s failure to include its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133042 - 2017-09-21
James D. Fox v. Jeffrey P. Endicott
the trial court for a writ of certiorari to challenge that decision. The trial court reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10081 - 2005-03-31
the trial court for a writ of certiorari to challenge that decision. The trial court reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10081 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was convicted following a jury trial of first-degree recklessly endangering safety by use of a dangerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948667 - 2025-04-30
was convicted following a jury trial of first-degree recklessly endangering safety by use of a dangerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948667 - 2025-04-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a “deliberate choice to proceed without counsel” because the trial court in a prior case did not advise him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100149 - 2017-09-21
a “deliberate choice to proceed without counsel” because the trial court in a prior case did not advise him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100149 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ruth E. Peterson
justifying the stop. The trial court denied Peterson’s motion. It determined that if Funk had himself seen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7624 - 2005-03-31
justifying the stop. The trial court denied Peterson’s motion. It determined that if Funk had himself seen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7624 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact. State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 283, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). We affirm the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36086 - 2009-04-06
of constitutional fact. State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 283, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). We affirm the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36086 - 2009-04-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
was that serious. The trial court concluded that Sweeney’s testimony was still insufficient to establish a prima
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51517 - 2014-09-15
was that serious. The trial court concluded that Sweeney’s testimony was still insufficient to establish a prima
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51517 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with Burris. The circuit court granted a hearing on the postconviction motion. Both Burris and trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107714 - 2017-09-21
with Burris. The circuit court granted a hearing on the postconviction motion. Both Burris and trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107714 - 2017-09-21