Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37441 - 37450 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 37441 - 37450 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
State v. Jacob E. Herman
and that it is a mandatory penalty. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. STATEMENT OF FACTS ¶2 The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3885 - 2017-09-20
and that it is a mandatory penalty. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. STATEMENT OF FACTS ¶2 The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3885 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of the search warrant” and failing to move to suppress the evidence and Lang’s subsequent custodial statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113805 - 2014-06-09
of the search warrant” and failing to move to suppress the evidence and Lang’s subsequent custodial statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113805 - 2014-06-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to impeach Catherine on inconsistent statements. For example, the SANE report showed that Catherine had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762853 - 2024-02-14
to impeach Catherine on inconsistent statements. For example, the SANE report showed that Catherine had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762853 - 2024-02-14
[PDF]
State v. Arminius D. Jones
.” (Footnote omitted.) This is No. 02-0649-CR 8 consistent with the supreme court’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5022 - 2017-09-19
.” (Footnote omitted.) This is No. 02-0649-CR 8 consistent with the supreme court’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5022 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 137
Lala argues that the supreme court’s statement “mere nudity is not enough” implies nudity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38547 - 2014-09-15
Lala argues that the supreme court’s statement “mere nudity is not enough” implies nudity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38547 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2 The State asserts in its statement of the case that Taylor’s trial counsel “had no questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252097 - 2020-01-07
. 2 The State asserts in its statement of the case that Taylor’s trial counsel “had no questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252097 - 2020-01-07
[PDF]
Hunzinger Construction Company v. Granite Resources Corp.
to testify for the insurance company about statements made to him by deceased policy holder because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7928 - 2017-09-19
to testify for the insurance company about statements made to him by deceased policy holder because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7928 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas W. Pfeifer
.” That is a correct statement of the law. However, a corollary proposition permits officers to expand the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14466 - 2017-09-21
.” That is a correct statement of the law. However, a corollary proposition permits officers to expand the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14466 - 2017-09-21
Tricia Janssen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
. We reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings. Statement of Facts ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3962 - 2005-03-31
. We reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings. Statement of Facts ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3962 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and also that one of the witnesses, I know her grandfather.” That statement led to the following exchange
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109920 - 2014-04-07
, and also that one of the witnesses, I know her grandfather.” That statement led to the following exchange
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109920 - 2014-04-07