Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37441 - 37450 of 44408 for name change.

State v. Steven M. Shimek
adequate reason for the defendant’s change of heart.’” Id. at 284, 592 N.W.2d at 227 (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15083 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Raymond B. Keller v. Thomas J. Morfeld
it to the exclusion of both his neighbors and the general public. Although his use of the area did not change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13313 - 2017-09-21

John A. Seitz v. Waukesha County
nonconforming uses would be invalidated by an illegal change and that such a remedy is consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9550 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Converse and Lovina Smith v. Wisconsin Institute for Torah Study, Inc.
regarding whether dormitories were prohibited; a zoning administrator supervisor's apparent change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11552 - 2017-09-19

2007 WI App 12
, the first several pages of the policy are devoted to certain changes in the wording of the policy since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27312 - 2007-01-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Thus, the individual’s incompetence … may change with time. It is because this possibility exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138472 - 2017-09-21

01-12 Amendment to Supreme Court Rules re Lawyer Regulation System
as a full year and a fiscal year for which no dues payment is required shall not count as a year. A change
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1143 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
older than her actual age. The number “9” on her birth year (1989) was changed to a “6,” and the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97787 - 2013-06-04

Steven J. Schuette v. Rebecca C. Gross-Schuette
by substantial evidence that the change of schedule was necessary because of conditions physically or emotionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26309 - 2006-08-29

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Virginia Rose Ray
to facilitate the change in counsel but now refused to refund any of the retainer. This led the client
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16795 - 2011-07-12