Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37441 - 37450 of 83405 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 37441 - 37450 of 83405 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Latasha J.
the case until September 5, 2002, so that Latasha could speak with her attorney and decide how to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6058 - 2005-03-31
the case until September 5, 2002, so that Latasha could speak with her attorney and decide how to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6058 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
forfeiture. “[A] voluntary and understanding guilty or no contest plea in a civil case constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116334 - 2017-09-21
forfeiture. “[A] voluntary and understanding guilty or no contest plea in a civil case constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116334 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to equal protection. We conclude there was a rational basis for the sentence. We affirm. ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52620 - 2014-09-15
to equal protection. We conclude there was a rational basis for the sentence. We affirm. ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52620 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discuss only that issue herein. No. 2022AP712 2 conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622126 - 2023-02-15
discuss only that issue herein. No. 2022AP712 2 conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622126 - 2023-02-15
[PDF]
CJT & L, Inc. v. Daryl A. Larson
additur and a new trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21162 - 2017-09-21
additur and a new trial. We disagree and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21162 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221237 - 2018-11-16
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221237 - 2018-11-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with voicemails. ¶3 On February 1, 2018, the parties signed a stipulation to dismiss the case, agreeing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246923 - 2019-09-17
with voicemails. ¶3 On February 1, 2018, the parties signed a stipulation to dismiss the case, agreeing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246923 - 2019-09-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=664914 - 2023-06-06
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=664914 - 2023-06-06
Richard G. Bedessem v. Donna J. Bedessem
property. At issue in this case is the trial court’s division of 139 shares
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11360 - 2005-03-31
property. At issue in this case is the trial court’s division of 139 shares
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11360 - 2005-03-31
State v. Vanessa Brockdorf
The issue in this case is whether the trial court correctly granted Brockdorf’s motion seeking to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7546 - 2005-03-31
The issue in this case is whether the trial court correctly granted Brockdorf’s motion seeking to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7546 - 2005-03-31