Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37471 - 37480 of 82867 for case search.
Search results 37471 - 37480 of 82867 for case search.
State v. Joseph J.J.
). With this law in place, we now turn to the facts of this case. We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10814 - 2005-03-31
). With this law in place, we now turn to the facts of this case. We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10814 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and explainable basis” with “delineation of the primary sentencing factors to the particular facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26957 - 2014-09-15
and explainable basis” with “delineation of the primary sentencing factors to the particular facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26957 - 2014-09-15
State v. Sheryl D. Stuckey
, 1994, and January 31, 1995.[4] The instant case involves a charge of operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12850 - 2005-03-31
, 1994, and January 31, 1995.[4] The instant case involves a charge of operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12850 - 2005-03-31
State v. Janice D.
attorney brings two cases to the court’s attention that appear to conflict with one another regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6781 - 2005-03-31
attorney brings two cases to the court’s attention that appear to conflict with one another regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6781 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
this unjust enrichment action. Concluding that this essentially was a case of “rob[bing] Peter to pay Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86527 - 2012-08-28
this unjust enrichment action. Concluding that this essentially was a case of “rob[bing] Peter to pay Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86527 - 2012-08-28
State v. Jason D. VanStraten
documentation regarding the Intoxalyzer machine; however, the court stated: “No, you have put your case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6881 - 2005-03-31
documentation regarding the Intoxalyzer machine; however, the court stated: “No, you have put your case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6881 - 2005-03-31
State v. Johnny M. McAdoo
information; and (3) whether the penalty enhancers were properly applied in this case. We affirm in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24926 - 2006-04-26
information; and (3) whether the penalty enhancers were properly applied in this case. We affirm in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24926 - 2006-04-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117960 - 2014-09-15
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117960 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Eric P. Russell
assaulting a fourteen-year-old girl, Sharon F. The case was tried to a jury. During the trial, Detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8409 - 2017-09-19
assaulting a fourteen-year-old girl, Sharon F. The case was tried to a jury. During the trial, Detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8409 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
criminal in case No. 2009CM340 and to the sole count of bail jumping as a habitual criminal in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79282 - 2014-09-15
criminal in case No. 2009CM340 and to the sole count of bail jumping as a habitual criminal in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79282 - 2014-09-15