Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37471 - 37480 of 83322 for case search.
Search results 37471 - 37480 of 83322 for case search.
Frontsheet
2013 WI 94 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2013AP1483-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104869 - 2013-11-25
2013 WI 94 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2013AP1483-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104869 - 2013-11-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the particular case have reported to the prosecutor’s office.” Id., ¶24. It then concluded that the statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263130 - 2020-06-04
to the particular case have reported to the prosecutor’s office.” Id., ¶24. It then concluded that the statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263130 - 2020-06-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463976 - 2021-12-22
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463976 - 2021-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Harrison M. Marcum
or that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when it sentenced him. In either case, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25003 - 2017-09-21
or that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when it sentenced him. In either case, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25003 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2013 WI 94 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP1483-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104869 - 2017-09-21
2013 WI 94 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP1483-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104869 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248934 - 2019-10-23
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248934 - 2019-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS
no contest to killing Joel even though the State’s case was weakened by the medical examiner’s initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29407 - 2007-06-18
no contest to killing Joel even though the State’s case was weakened by the medical examiner’s initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29407 - 2007-06-18
[PDF]
State v. Cheryl Braun
In this case, the record reflects considerable confusion about what actually was being litigated. Initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8823 - 2017-09-19
In this case, the record reflects considerable confusion about what actually was being litigated. Initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8823 - 2017-09-19
State v. Lee R. Crouthers
, but the trial court denied the motion. On appeal, we certified the case to the supreme court, requesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4663 - 2005-03-31
, but the trial court denied the motion. On appeal, we certified the case to the supreme court, requesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4663 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252785 - 2020-01-22
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252785 - 2020-01-22