Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37471 - 37480 of 68502 for did.
Search results 37471 - 37480 of 68502 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
manner, that he reasonably objected to the blood draw, and that the gravity of the offense did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34114 - 2008-09-30
manner, that he reasonably objected to the blood draw, and that the gravity of the offense did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34114 - 2008-09-30
COURT OF APPEALS
that “he [did not] want to have a trial [that day] and that he want[ed] to fire his attorney.” In response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2009-06-15
that “he [did not] want to have a trial [that day] and that he want[ed] to fire his attorney.” In response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2009-06-15
[PDF]
State v. Dominic E.W.
in the juvenile system. The trial court did not misuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm. 2 In May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12928 - 2017-09-21
in the juvenile system. The trial court did not misuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm. 2 In May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12928 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
; (2) certain language in the divorce judgment did not constitute a child support order; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42693 - 2014-09-15
; (2) certain language in the divorce judgment did not constitute a child support order; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42693 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
found him by following a trail of his blood to his apartment. Thames did not dispute the truth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181792 - 2017-09-21
found him by following a trail of his blood to his apartment. Thames did not dispute the truth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181792 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
obtained during the stop on two grounds. First, Brandsma argued that officers did not have reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196467 - 2017-09-21
obtained during the stop on two grounds. First, Brandsma argued that officers did not have reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196467 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was “graphic, disturbing, and extremely prejudicial,” the danger of unfair prejudice did not substantially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26710 - 2006-10-09
was “graphic, disturbing, and extremely prejudicial,” the danger of unfair prejudice did not substantially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26710 - 2006-10-09
2010 WI APP 57
. Because Brimer’s counsel did not object at the hearing, this argument is before us as an ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48024 - 2011-02-07
. Because Brimer’s counsel did not object at the hearing, this argument is before us as an ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48024 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32.2 Wilder did not file a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290960 - 2020-09-29
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32.2 Wilder did not file a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290960 - 2020-09-29
State v. Mark Andrew Rea
that Rea stated, “yeah, I did it, and I'd do it again,” and “yeah, I killed her.” Another classmate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8110 - 2005-03-31
that Rea stated, “yeah, I did it, and I'd do it again,” and “yeah, I killed her.” Another classmate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8110 - 2005-03-31