Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37471 - 37480 of 58507 for speedy trial.
Search results 37471 - 37480 of 58507 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and addresses Mathauer’s no-contest plea, the conditions of his probation, and his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088025 - 2026-03-10
and addresses Mathauer’s no-contest plea, the conditions of his probation, and his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088025 - 2026-03-10
Deborah K. Deforth v. Gary L. Deforth
Gary appeared earlier in the proceedings with counsel, but appeared at his trial without representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25547 - 2006-06-14
Gary appeared earlier in the proceedings with counsel, but appeared at his trial without representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25547 - 2006-06-14
Charles Johnson v. Rogers Memorial Hospital, Inc.
to develop false memories of abuse that never occurred. The trial court dismissed the complaint
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1245 - 2004-04-14
to develop false memories of abuse that never occurred. The trial court dismissed the complaint
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1245 - 2004-04-14
Lyle Schuricht v. MAZ Guardianship Services, Inc.
on June 8, 2000, and trial was set for October 2. ¶3 On September 25, the court received a note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4471 - 2005-03-31
on June 8, 2000, and trial was set for October 2. ¶3 On September 25, the court received a note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4471 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
things, he claimed that: (1) he was entitled to a new trial because he was never properly examined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34292 - 2008-10-14
things, he claimed that: (1) he was entitled to a new trial because he was never properly examined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34292 - 2008-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
is about: a credibility determination. We will not reverse a credibility determination of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33033 - 2008-06-17
is about: a credibility determination. We will not reverse a credibility determination of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33033 - 2008-06-17
State v. Cleveland R. Barnes
argues on appeal that the trial court erred when sentencing him by failing to consider the sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5066 - 2005-03-31
argues on appeal that the trial court erred when sentencing him by failing to consider the sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5066 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In it, he complains that his trial counsel led him to believe that he was required to enter dispositive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125161 - 2017-09-21
. In it, he complains that his trial counsel led him to believe that he was required to enter dispositive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125161 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at sentencing; (3) whether the circuit court erred when it denied Schulte’s pre-trial motion to suppress her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101917 - 2017-09-21
at sentencing; (3) whether the circuit court erred when it denied Schulte’s pre-trial motion to suppress her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101917 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
history of the case and addresses the validity of Kent’s plea and whether trial counsel afforded Kent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082482 - 2026-02-24
history of the case and addresses the validity of Kent’s plea and whether trial counsel afforded Kent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082482 - 2026-02-24