Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37491 - 37500 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 37491 - 37500 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or subsequent offense. Collier has filed a response challenging the denial of his pretrial suppression motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158071 - 2017-09-21
or subsequent offense. Collier has filed a response challenging the denial of his pretrial suppression motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158071 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion to amend his judgment of conviction, arguing that there is no factual basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793415 - 2024-04-25
postconviction motion to amend his judgment of conviction, arguing that there is no factual basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793415 - 2024-04-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion to amend his judgment of conviction, arguing that there is no factual basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793415 - 2024-04-25
postconviction motion to amend his judgment of conviction, arguing that there is no factual basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793415 - 2024-04-25
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
appeals a judgment of conviction and order denying his postconviction motion. He argues he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020235 - 2025-10-08
appeals a judgment of conviction and order denying his postconviction motion. He argues he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020235 - 2025-10-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion in which he sought a new trial on the ground
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220277 - 2018-10-03
of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion in which he sought a new trial on the ground
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220277 - 2018-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial without a hearing.[1] He had alleged that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70797 - 2011-09-12
an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial without a hearing.[1] He had alleged that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70797 - 2011-09-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. filed a postdisposition motion alleging that her no contest plea was not knowing, voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246011 - 2019-09-04
. filed a postdisposition motion alleging that her no contest plea was not knowing, voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246011 - 2019-09-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion. In response, the State argues that by failing to bring a postconviction motion challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160208 - 2017-09-21
discretion. In response, the State argues that by failing to bring a postconviction motion challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160208 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
granted Olson’s motion in limine, restricted evidence of Storm’s alleged mental illness to the time frame
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79668 - 2012-03-20
granted Olson’s motion in limine, restricted evidence of Storm’s alleged mental illness to the time frame
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79668 - 2012-03-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion to modify his sentence.2 Saffold argues that the legislative repeal of positive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86665 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion to modify his sentence.2 Saffold argues that the legislative repeal of positive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86665 - 2014-09-15