Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3751 - 3760 of 30059 for de.

[PDF] WI App 141
a question of law, our review is de novo. See Town of Avon v. Oliver, 2002 WI App 97, ¶7, 253 Wis. 2d 647
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70451 - 2014-09-15

Shriners Hospitals for Children v. St. Mary's Hospital Milwaukee Foundation, Inc.
of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6930 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. State v. Cameron, 2012 WI App 93, ¶11, 344 Wis. 2d 101, 820 N.W.2d 433. However, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=621713 - 2023-02-15

[PDF] City of Waukesha v. Town Board of the Town of
permit for a commercial PUD in a residential district was a “de facto rezoning” of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7814 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 89
of deference: great weight, due weight or de novo. American Mfrs., 252 Wis. 2d 155, ¶11. ¶6 While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36533 - 2014-09-15

State v. George Owens
the defendant to relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. “However, if the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14170 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the motion alleges sufficient facts is a question of law that we review de novo. See Allen, 274 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204240 - 2017-12-05

[PDF] NOTICE
on the evidence.” State ex rel. Smits v. City of De Pere, 104 Wis. 2d 26, 31, 310 N.W.2d 607, 609 (1981); see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29838 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
judgment de novo, and “[a] party is entitled to summary judgment if there are no genuine issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53088 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
granted the motion, and Nancy sought de novo review. Over the course of two hearings, the court heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134439 - 2015-03-04