Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3751 - 3760 of 29740 for des.

WI APP 91 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2256 2012AP2257 Comple...
during the “first-in” period. We review de novo the legal issues decided by the circuit court. See Loth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98257 - 2014-03-09

COURT OF APPEALS
physical placement and visitation. ¶12 We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69467 - 2011-08-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court commissioner granted the motion, and Nancy sought de novo review. Over the course of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134439 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. Breitzman, 378 Wis. 2d 431, ¶¶37-39. ¶12 Here, Bradley has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222252 - 2018-10-16

[PDF] Milwaukee Police Association v. The City of Milwaukee
on summary judgment and present only issues of law. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See Welter v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12247 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
and review de novo the grant or denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89924 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Tensfeldt v. Haberman, 2009 WI 77
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47351 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for five years of expenses. ¶9 North then moved for de novo review of the court commissioner’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204934 - 2017-12-18

United Airlines, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14364 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6, 306 Wis. 2d 513, 743 N.W.2d 843. Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197133 - 2017-09-28