Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3751 - 3760 of 33960 for dismissed.
Search results 3751 - 3760 of 33960 for dismissed.
State v. Marc Norfleet
ANDERSON, J. The State appeals a judgment of acquittal that dismisses, with prejudice, the case against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3991 - 2005-03-31
ANDERSON, J. The State appeals a judgment of acquittal that dismisses, with prejudice, the case against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3991 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to dismiss the state charge and the circuit court did so. ¶3 Subsequently, Al-Mujaahid filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80626 - 2012-04-09
to dismiss the state charge and the circuit court did so. ¶3 Subsequently, Al-Mujaahid filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80626 - 2012-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel moved unsuccessfully to dismiss the reckless endangerment charges on grounds of lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103615 - 2013-10-29
counsel moved unsuccessfully to dismiss the reckless endangerment charges on grounds of lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103615 - 2013-10-29
Steven Derkson v. Troy Haarstick
dismissed Derkson’s claims against two other respondents, Holiday Inn Sun Spree Resort (the resort) and its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2807 - 2005-03-31
dismissed Derkson’s claims against two other respondents, Holiday Inn Sun Spree Resort (the resort) and its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2807 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Steven Derkson v. Troy Haarstick
the respondent, Troy Haarstick. The judgment dismissed Derkson’s claims against two other respondents, Holiday
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2807 - 2017-09-19
the respondent, Troy Haarstick. The judgment dismissed Derkson’s claims against two other respondents, Holiday
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2807 - 2017-09-19
State v. Alice C. Ketter
by the State for their removal. Because we also reject Alice’s arguments regarding the motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10621 - 2005-03-31
by the State for their removal. Because we also reject Alice’s arguments regarding the motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10621 - 2005-03-31
Glenn F. Plautz By Charlotte Pagel v. Time Insurance Company
the trial court's dismissal on summary judgment of its bad-faith action against Time Insurance Company. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10001 - 2005-03-31
the trial court's dismissal on summary judgment of its bad-faith action against Time Insurance Company. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10001 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be dismissed to permit Mack to file a postconviction motion. Counsel therefore seeks voluntary dismissal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141916 - 2017-09-21
be dismissed to permit Mack to file a postconviction motion. Counsel therefore seeks voluntary dismissal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141916 - 2017-09-21
David J. Rustad v. Michael Sullivan
appeals from an order dismissing his petition for review of a parole revocation decision. Rustad filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9031 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order dismissing his petition for review of a parole revocation decision. Rustad filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9031 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no-merit appeals. Counsel has now filed a motion to dismiss the appeals and extend the time to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910663 - 2025-02-06
no-merit appeals. Counsel has now filed a motion to dismiss the appeals and extend the time to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910663 - 2025-02-06