Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3751 - 3760 of 6391 for dr.
Search results 3751 - 3760 of 6391 for dr.
[PDF]
State v. Mark R. Anderson
. ¶6 According to Hanson’s testimony, she works for Dr. Stephen A. Cullinan of Health Professionals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20383 - 2017-09-21
. ¶6 According to Hanson’s testimony, she works for Dr. Stephen A. Cullinan of Health Professionals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20383 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
evaluation and ultimately received reports from Dr. Donna Minter and Dr. John Laney. Although both experts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38341 - 2009-07-27
evaluation and ultimately received reports from Dr. Donna Minter and Dr. John Laney. Although both experts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38341 - 2009-07-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
)(am)1., (2)(dr). Miller subsequently entered no-contest pleas to Counts 1, 4 and 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699165 - 2023-09-06
)(am)1., (2)(dr). Miller subsequently entered no-contest pleas to Counts 1, 4 and 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699165 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
The evaluating psychologist, Dr. Deborah L. Collins, submitted a report opining to a reasonable degree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165107 - 2017-09-21
The evaluating psychologist, Dr. Deborah L. Collins, submitted a report opining to a reasonable degree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165107 - 2017-09-21
Seidel Tanning Corporation v. City of Milwaukee
is inappropriate, finding: “The plaintiff’s own expert, Dr. Christiansen, said that what we have here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16035 - 2005-03-31
is inappropriate, finding: “The plaintiff’s own expert, Dr. Christiansen, said that what we have here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16035 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Seidel Tanning Corporation v. City of Milwaukee
loquitur is inappropriate, finding: “The plaintiff’s own expert, Dr. Christiansen, said that what we have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16035 - 2017-09-21
loquitur is inappropriate, finding: “The plaintiff’s own expert, Dr. Christiansen, said that what we have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16035 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, and their residential real estate at $600,000. ¶4 The parties jointly retained Dr. William Taylor to value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54516 - 2010-09-15
, and their residential real estate at $600,000. ¶4 The parties jointly retained Dr. William Taylor to value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54516 - 2010-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in Warwick, Rhode Island via a transition plan implemented by Dr. Gary Kendziorski. August 20, 2008 – Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42978 - 2009-11-03
in Warwick, Rhode Island via a transition plan implemented by Dr. Gary Kendziorski. August 20, 2008 – Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42978 - 2009-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
from a bat. ¶5 Two witnesses testified at the hearing. Dr. Kenneth Siegesmund, a retired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102929 - 2013-10-14
from a bat. ¶5 Two witnesses testified at the hearing. Dr. Kenneth Siegesmund, a retired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102929 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a child. See WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1). ¶4 The State also presented expert testimony from Dr. Cynthia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104459 - 2017-09-21
of a child. See WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1). ¶4 The State also presented expert testimony from Dr. Cynthia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104459 - 2017-09-21