Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3751 - 3760 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 3751 - 3760 of 58483 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
motion.[1] The issue is whether the trial court imposed a lengthier sentence for Arrington’s refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35919 - 2009-03-23
motion.[1] The issue is whether the trial court imposed a lengthier sentence for Arrington’s refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35919 - 2009-03-23
Jay R. Lellman v. Annette Mott
in obtaining a modification of the previously entered divorce judgment.[1] Lellman contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10953 - 2005-03-31
in obtaining a modification of the previously entered divorce judgment.[1] Lellman contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10953 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael R. Cooper
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial, claiming that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5586 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial, claiming that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5586 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
accident resulting in death. The trial court imposed a twenty-two-year term of imprisonment, bifurcated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138499 - 2017-09-21
accident resulting in death. The trial court imposed a twenty-two-year term of imprisonment, bifurcated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138499 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
), 939.63, and 941.29(2) (2007-08).[1] He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55089 - 2010-10-04
), 939.63, and 941.29(2) (2007-08).[1] He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55089 - 2010-10-04
State v. Dennis L. Steele
postconviction motion for a new trial. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to submit the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13267 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion for a new trial. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to submit the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13267 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and that, as a result, the jury was improperly instructed at trial, entitling him to a new trial. Alternatively, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40739 - 2009-09-15
, and that, as a result, the jury was improperly instructed at trial, entitling him to a new trial. Alternatively, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40739 - 2009-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
are to the 2007-08 version unless otherwise noted. 2 The trial court awarded Ackerman $1750 plus costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46257 - 2014-09-15
are to the 2007-08 version unless otherwise noted. 2 The trial court awarded Ackerman $1750 plus costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46257 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
).1 He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55089 - 2014-09-15
).1 He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55089 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
awarding Dr. Marc J. Ackerman $1855.61[2] in attorney fees based on the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46257 - 2010-01-25
awarding Dr. Marc J. Ackerman $1855.61[2] in attorney fees based on the trial court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46257 - 2010-01-25