Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3751 - 3760 of 72987 for we.
Search results 3751 - 3760 of 72987 for we.
[PDF]
Ernie Garibay v. Circuit Court for Kenosha County
the codefendant is not yet before the court. We conclude that the language of § 971.20(6) is plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5135 - 2017-09-19
the codefendant is not yet before the court. We conclude that the language of § 971.20(6) is plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5135 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael W. Worden
wages earned under the Huber law, we affirm those parts of the court’s judgment. However, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2116 - 2005-03-31
wages earned under the Huber law, we affirm those parts of the court’s judgment. However, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2116 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Deterding’s pants pocket. We disagree and conclude that, under the circumstances, it was reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162985 - 2017-09-21
Deterding’s pants pocket. We disagree and conclude that, under the circumstances, it was reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162985 - 2017-09-21
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
] We agree and reverse the order. Magnuson was initially charged with eight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13904 - 2005-03-31
] We agree and reverse the order. Magnuson was initially charged with eight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13904 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Miyosha K. White
Based on standard canons of statutory construction, we conclude that WIS. STAT. § 973. 01(3g), 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7489 - 2017-09-20
Based on standard canons of statutory construction, we conclude that WIS. STAT. § 973. 01(3g), 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7489 - 2017-09-20
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Clay F. Teasdale
license revoked. ¶1 PER CURIUM. We review a referee's recommendation that the license of Clay F
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19616 - 2005-09-12
license revoked. ¶1 PER CURIUM. We review a referee's recommendation that the license of Clay F
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19616 - 2005-09-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
available under the policy. We therefore affirm. ¶2 According to the Cullens’ complaint, on August 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987239 - 2025-07-23
available under the policy. We therefore affirm. ¶2 According to the Cullens’ complaint, on August 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987239 - 2025-07-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on appeal as to why he is entitled to a new trial. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555655 - 2022-08-16
on appeal as to why he is entitled to a new trial. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555655 - 2022-08-16
WI App 42 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1345-CR Complete Title...
period of parole instead of to his term of reincarceration following the revocation of his parole. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109611 - 2014-04-29
period of parole instead of to his term of reincarceration following the revocation of his parole. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109611 - 2014-04-29
State v. Robert Johnson
that asportation is not an element of robbery. We disagree. In 1972, in Moore v. State, 55 Wis. 2d 1, 197 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16979 - 2005-03-31
that asportation is not an element of robbery. We disagree. In 1972, in Moore v. State, 55 Wis. 2d 1, 197 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16979 - 2005-03-31