Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37521 - 37530 of 83350 for case search.
Search results 37521 - 37530 of 83350 for case search.
State v. James G. Freer
and frustrated a fair presentation of the case.[1] Id. ¶4 Turning to the first factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6330 - 2005-03-31
and frustrated a fair presentation of the case.[1] Id. ¶4 Turning to the first factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6330 - 2005-03-31
State v. Caran K. Zastrow
a secondary test, “in this case it could not be breath because of the injuries that she had sustained.”[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9538 - 2005-03-31
a secondary test, “in this case it could not be breath because of the injuries that she had sustained.”[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9538 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be pursued on appeal. We therefore summarily affirm. Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2020CF3635
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987074 - 2025-07-22
be pursued on appeal. We therefore summarily affirm. Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2020CF3635
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987074 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of this case to determine if probable cause existed at the time of Kosmosky’s arrest. ¶7 An officer must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145595 - 2017-09-21
of this case to determine if probable cause existed at the time of Kosmosky’s arrest. ¶7 An officer must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145595 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in Marathon County case No. 2015CF254. Several days before Strohkirch’s battery case was set to be tried
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207815 - 2018-01-30
in Marathon County case No. 2015CF254. Several days before Strohkirch’s battery case was set to be tried
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207815 - 2018-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in a separate case dismissed but read in at sentencing. The plea agreement also included a provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760429 - 2024-02-06
in a separate case dismissed but read in at sentencing. The plea agreement also included a provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760429 - 2024-02-06
State v. Douglas Maug
and cause remanded with directions. SUNDBY, J. In this case, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7896 - 2005-03-31
and cause remanded with directions. SUNDBY, J. In this case, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7896 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in a separate case dismissed but read in at sentencing. The plea agreement also included a provision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760429 - 2024-02-06
in a separate case dismissed but read in at sentencing. The plea agreement also included a provision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760429 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227745 - 2018-11-19
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227745 - 2018-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248934 - 2019-10-23
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248934 - 2019-10-23