Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37531 - 37540 of 55165 for n c.

Larry E. Olson v. Jon Litscher
version of “Megan’s Law,” see State v. Bollig, 224 Wis. 2d 621, 637-38 & n.4, 593 N.W.2d 67 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15428 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael J. Burnett
. See State v. Byrge, 225 Wis. 2d 702, 717-18, n.7, 594 N.W.2d 388 (Ct. App. 1999) (“holdings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6159 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
at 275 n.4 (quoting Foust, 165 Wis. 2d at 434). Our supreme court has also clarified that “[i]t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660087 - 2023-05-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶43 n.11, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. Here, the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194605 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Penny L. Swanson
to deliver and renews her challenge to the warrant on appeal. Section 968.22, STATS., provides that "[n]o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8845 - 2017-09-19

State v. Marshall Jones
a credibility determination. Wurtz v. Fleischman, 97 Wis. 2d 100, 107 n.3, 293 N.W.2d 155 (1980). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26365 - 2006-09-05

State v. Adan Castellano
and strategy unless the findings are clearly erroneous. State v. Knight, 168 Wis.2d 509, 514 n.2, 484 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9537 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jon G. Rose
part of the seizure and does not require a separate judicially authorized warrant.” Id. at ¶1 n.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5035 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
, we do not address it, Vesely v. Security First Nat’l Bank, 128 Wis. 2d 246, 255 n.5, 381 N.W.2d 593
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117960 - 2014-07-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Milwaukee, WI 53202 Julie M. Gay 520 N. Grand Ave. Waukesha, WI 53186 You are hereby
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244431 - 2019-07-31