Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37531 - 37540 of 58381 for speedy trial.
Search results 37531 - 37540 of 58381 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 125.66(1).2 Rowe argues that the evidence the State presented at her trial was insufficient to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=945880 - 2025-04-22
. § 125.66(1).2 Rowe argues that the evidence the State presented at her trial was insufficient to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=945880 - 2025-04-22
[PDF]
Angela M. Peabody v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
dated January 17, 1997. Because the trial court based its decision on a policy exclusion not relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13078 - 2017-09-21
dated January 17, 1997. Because the trial court based its decision on a policy exclusion not relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13078 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mary H.
. She also asserts that her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to opinion testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2184 - 2017-09-19
. She also asserts that her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to opinion testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2184 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to appear at a pre-trial hearing and his failure to provide the court with a mailing address. A.D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501479 - 2022-03-31
to appear at a pre-trial hearing and his failure to provide the court with a mailing address. A.D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501479 - 2022-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mary H.
. She also asserts that her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to opinion testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2186 - 2017-09-19
. She also asserts that her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to opinion testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2186 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gerald D. Barr
of an 2 Barr disputes this fact, but the trial court explicitly found he gave voluntary consent. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6566 - 2017-09-19
of an 2 Barr disputes this fact, but the trial court explicitly found he gave voluntary consent. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6566 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Wendi Louah v. St. Mary's Hospital
was improperly maintained. The trial court granted St. Mary’s motion. Louah appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14571 - 2017-09-21
was improperly maintained. The trial court granted St. Mary’s motion. Louah appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14571 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 24
—and that the Council’s denial of his application was arbitrary, unreasonable, and discriminatory. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76635 - 2014-09-15
—and that the Council’s denial of his application was arbitrary, unreasonable, and discriminatory. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76635 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Ronald Waites v. Gary R. McCaughtry
and 303.20, respectively. The trial court determined that reversal was required because No. 95-1550
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9153 - 2017-09-19
and 303.20, respectively. The trial court determined that reversal was required because No. 95-1550
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9153 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Martin Mellenthin v. Rodney Berger
that the trial court erred in its analysis of Durand Rural’s classification. We therefore reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5685 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court erred in its analysis of Durand Rural’s classification. We therefore reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5685 - 2017-09-19