Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37541 - 37550 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 37541 - 37550 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Chong Leng Lee
tools. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19895 - 2017-09-21
tools. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19895 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his motion for No. 2021AP1807-CR 2 postconviction relief. Wild contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612475 - 2023-01-20
and an order denying his motion for No. 2021AP1807-CR 2 postconviction relief. Wild contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612475 - 2023-01-20
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115431 - 2014-06-25
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115431 - 2014-06-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). We therefore deny the State’s motion for summary dismissal. Addressing the merits, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744598 - 2023-12-28
). We therefore deny the State’s motion for summary dismissal. Addressing the merits, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744598 - 2023-12-28
COURT OF APPEALS
granted Olson’s motion in limine, restricted evidence of Storm’s alleged mental illness to the time frame
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79668 - 2012-03-20
granted Olson’s motion in limine, restricted evidence of Storm’s alleged mental illness to the time frame
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79668 - 2012-03-20
CA Blank Order
rulings. Specifically, counsel addresses the circuit court decisions: (1) denying Sersted’s motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108289 - 2014-02-18
rulings. Specifically, counsel addresses the circuit court decisions: (1) denying Sersted’s motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108289 - 2014-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion to modify his sentence.[2] Saffold argues that the legislative repeal of positive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86665 - 2012-09-04
postconviction motion to modify his sentence.[2] Saffold argues that the legislative repeal of positive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86665 - 2012-09-04
County of Dane v. Jeffrey J. Mawhinney
granted the motion because it concluded that the police did not have probable cause to arrest. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3675 - 2005-03-31
granted the motion because it concluded that the police did not have probable cause to arrest. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3675 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 973.055. Johnson also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. He seeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169103 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. § 973.055. Johnson also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. He seeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169103 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
pro se an order granting the motion of the defendants, Michael Sherman and Timothy Gilberg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35531 - 2014-09-15
pro se an order granting the motion of the defendants, Michael Sherman and Timothy Gilberg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35531 - 2014-09-15

