Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37551 - 37560 of 63304 for Motion for joint custody.

COURT OF APPEALS
it denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained during an investigatory traffic stop. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43253 - 2009-11-10

State v. Corey L. Wilkins
reckless homicide, party to a crime, and an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8407 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence, arguing that the officer unlawfully extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249376 - 2019-10-30

COURT OF APPEALS
months as straight jail time. ¶4 Hintz subsequently filed numerous pro se motions seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80278 - 2012-04-02

[PDF] State v. Steven Schelk
erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence because the officers did Nos. 98-0021-CR 98-0022-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13486 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification or plea withdrawal. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240676 - 2019-05-15

Tricia Janssen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Insurance Company appeals an order denying its summary judgment motion.[1] State Farm argues the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5838 - 2005-03-31

State v. Quincy Ferguson
motion, following his convictions for two drug offenses and bail jumping. He challenges only that part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8164 - 2005-03-31

Traditional Design Works, Ltd. v. John McGourthy, Jr.
’ contract. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. TDW sought partial summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13064 - 2005-03-31

Johnny Lacy, Jr. v. James LaBelle
to § 146.84(1)(b), Stats. He also sought relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties filed cross-motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31