Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37561 - 37570 of 97585 for court records search online.
Search results 37561 - 37570 of 97585 for court records search online.
State v. Thomas C. Grohmann
was, there would be a potential for Huber. THE COURT: Was that put on the record? [PROSECUTOR]: I'm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9143 - 2005-03-31
was, there would be a potential for Huber. THE COURT: Was that put on the record? [PROSECUTOR]: I'm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9143 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas C. Grohmann
. THE COURT: I'm sure the negotiations were put on the record, I always ask for it. Was that what I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9143 - 2017-09-19
. THE COURT: I'm sure the negotiations were put on the record, I always ask for it. Was that what I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9143 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Rock County v. Virgil D.
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 2, 2006 Cornelia G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21208 - 2017-09-21
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 2, 2006 Cornelia G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21208 - 2017-09-21
Rock County v. Virgil D.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 2, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21208 - 2006-02-01
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 2, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21208 - 2006-02-01
[PDF]
Jennifer Lynn Schaefer v. Anthony Wade Schaefer
. The record indicates the court heard only part of the case on that date due to time constraints. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6747 - 2017-09-20
. The record indicates the court heard only part of the case on that date due to time constraints. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6747 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
findings of fact and conclusions of law. We disagree. The record shows that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726647 - 2023-11-09
findings of fact and conclusions of law. We disagree. The record shows that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726647 - 2023-11-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
findings of fact and conclusions of law. We disagree. The record shows that the circuit court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726647 - 2023-11-09
findings of fact and conclusions of law. We disagree. The record shows that the circuit court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726647 - 2023-11-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. During the hearing on the postconviction motion, the circuit court explained that the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206310 - 2017-12-26
. During the hearing on the postconviction motion, the circuit court explained that the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206310 - 2017-12-26
State v. Torrence D. Goss
plea existed.” This claim strains logic. We are convinced that the record demonstrates the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3059 - 2005-03-31
plea existed.” This claim strains logic. We are convinced that the record demonstrates the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3059 - 2005-03-31
State v. Torrence D. Goss
plea existed.” This claim strains logic. We are convinced that the record demonstrates the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3058 - 2005-03-31
plea existed.” This claim strains logic. We are convinced that the record demonstrates the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3058 - 2005-03-31