Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37591 - 37600 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 37591 - 37600 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence, which was based upon his contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184846 - 2017-09-21
court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence, which was based upon his contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184846 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael A. Sisk
, against Michael A. Sisk, following a suppression motion hearing. The State argues that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3075 - 2005-03-31
, against Michael A. Sisk, following a suppression motion hearing. The State argues that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3075 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Aman Singh, pro se, appeals a circuit court order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=764421 - 2024-02-15
. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Aman Singh, pro se, appeals a circuit court order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=764421 - 2024-02-15
COURT OF APPEALS
erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. For the reasons we explain below, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53254 - 2010-08-11
erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. For the reasons we explain below, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53254 - 2010-08-11
[PDF]
State v. Chester Hill
- Hill raises two issues of error: (1) whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9830 - 2017-09-19
- Hill raises two issues of error: (1) whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9830 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Susan M. Cotten
Sperling- Newton, made findings of fact and conclusions of law in response to the Board's motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16413 - 2017-09-21
Sperling- Newton, made findings of fact and conclusions of law in response to the Board's motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16413 - 2017-09-21
State v. David W. Janke
. Janke first contends on appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8748 - 2005-03-31
. Janke first contends on appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8748 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
previously been joined. The trial court indicated that it would decide both motions on the day of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140327 - 2017-09-21
previously been joined. The trial court indicated that it would decide both motions on the day of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140327 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115431 - 2014-06-25
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115431 - 2014-06-25
[PDF]
State v. Michael W. Farrell
postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. Farrell contends that the circuit court developed a reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13933 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. Farrell contends that the circuit court developed a reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13933 - 2014-09-15