Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37591 - 37600 of 83402 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 37591 - 37600 of 83402 for simple case search/1000.
Certification
. Rule 809.61 (2005-06)[1] this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29567 - 2007-07-02
. Rule 809.61 (2005-06)[1] this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29567 - 2007-07-02
State v. Harlan L. Horswill
that the facts of the Washington incidents were very similar to those alleged in this case. The court observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12071 - 2005-03-31
that the facts of the Washington incidents were very similar to those alleged in this case. The court observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12071 - 2005-03-31
State v. Antoinette Kennedy
not guilty and the case was set for a jury trial. On March 26, 2001, the date the trial was supposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4705 - 2005-03-31
not guilty and the case was set for a jury trial. On March 26, 2001, the date the trial was supposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4705 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lori L. Fleig v. Patrick A. Fleig
of this case. We therefore conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion. ¶7 Lori argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2808 - 2017-09-19
of this case. We therefore conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion. ¶7 Lori argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2808 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Sandra Kube v. Thomas A. Pietruszka
. This case arises from a dispute over Sandra L. Kube’s Hodunk Road property. Kube and Pietruszka entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14917 - 2017-09-21
. This case arises from a dispute over Sandra L. Kube’s Hodunk Road property. Kube and Pietruszka entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14917 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174762 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174762 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Unaware of the prior conviction in North Dakota, Pierce County charged the case as a civil forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26883 - 2014-09-15
. Unaware of the prior conviction in North Dakota, Pierce County charged the case as a civil forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26883 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Harlan L. Horswill
in this case. The court observed that Horswill’s defense in this case was that the touchings may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12072 - 2017-09-21
in this case. The court observed that Horswill’s defense in this case was that the touchings may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12072 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 The replevin order was granted by the Honorable Glenn H. Yamahiro in Milwaukee County Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226494 - 2018-11-06
2 The replevin order was granted by the Honorable Glenn H. Yamahiro in Milwaukee County Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226494 - 2018-11-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
Brown’s case; trial counsel was not obliged to predict that change in the law. See State v. McMahon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50284 - 2014-09-15
Brown’s case; trial counsel was not obliged to predict that change in the law. See State v. McMahon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50284 - 2014-09-15