Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3761 - 3770 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 3761 - 3770 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
This case involves the interpretation of a statute, which is a question of law; our review is de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483464 - 2022-02-16
This case involves the interpretation of a statute, which is a question of law; our review is de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483464 - 2022-02-16
Mildred Plisch v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services
was March 1, 2000. ¶4 The parties agree that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4433 - 2014-11-19
was March 1, 2000. ¶4 The parties agree that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4433 - 2014-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Martin J. De Vries Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Kelly Enright Clerk of Circuit Court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=678706 - 2023-07-13
. Martin J. De Vries Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Kelly Enright Clerk of Circuit Court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=678706 - 2023-07-13
[PDF]
State v. Pharoah Vernon Morris
a defendant has been denied the right to a speedy trial is a constitutional question that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2222 - 2017-09-19
a defendant has been denied the right to a speedy trial is a constitutional question that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2222 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is one of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference to the lower courts. State v. Wilson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125229 - 2017-09-21
is one of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference to the lower courts. State v. Wilson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125229 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, where relevant to our analysis. DISCUSSION ¶13 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482148 - 2022-02-08
, where relevant to our analysis. DISCUSSION ¶13 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482148 - 2022-02-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
provision. These are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Starks, 2013 WI 69, ¶28, 349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140359 - 2017-09-21
provision. These are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Starks, 2013 WI 69, ¶28, 349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140359 - 2017-09-21
Laurie L. Gruber v. Village of North Fond du Lac
is a question of law. Id. at 305. We appreciate that we decide the case de novo without any deference paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6145 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law. Id. at 305. We appreciate that we decide the case de novo without any deference paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6145 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the evidence.” State ex rel. Smits v. City of De Pere, 104 Wis. 2d 26, 31, 310 N.W.2d 607, 609 (1981); see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29838 - 2014-09-15
on the evidence.” State ex rel. Smits v. City of De Pere, 104 Wis. 2d 26, 31, 310 N.W.2d 607, 609 (1981); see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29838 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Caroline L. Peterson v. Arlington Hospitality Staffing, Inc.
. Peterson now appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶5 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6983 - 2017-09-20
. Peterson now appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶5 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6983 - 2017-09-20