Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3761 - 3770 of 30059 for de.

COURT OF APPEALS
of review. ¶14 Jahimiak suggests that our review is de novo because it involves the construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63998 - 2011-05-11

96 CV 1749 William A. Pangman v. Richard William King
and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: robert De Chambeau, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14075 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. George Owens
, which we review de novo. See id. “However, if the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14170 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Village of DeForest v. County of Dane
review the grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10901 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Milwaukee Police Association v. City of Milwaukee
on summary judgment and present only issues of law. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See Welter v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13002 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment de novo, independently of the circuit court, applying the same methodology. AccuWeb, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143539 - 2015-06-24

[PDF] W.T. Corporation v. The Town of Waukesha
permit for a commercial PUD in a residential district was a “de facto rezoning” of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7815 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Royal C. Neumann v. Town of Waukesha
permit for a commercial PUD in a residential district was a “de facto rezoning” of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7816 - 2017-09-19

Jonas Doyle Carter v. Crystal Marie Carter
the difference in the division is de minimus, a deviation from the presumption of a fifty-fifty division did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7442 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
physical placement and visitation. ¶12 We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69467 - 2011-08-10