Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3761 - 3770 of 6391 for dr.
Search results 3761 - 3770 of 6391 for dr.
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the respondents in Warwick, Rhode Island via a transition plan implemented by Dr. Gary Kendziorski. August 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42978 - 2014-09-15
to the respondents in Warwick, Rhode Island via a transition plan implemented by Dr. Gary Kendziorski. August 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42978 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jimmy Lee Hensley
professionals, Drs. John Laney and Gary Cowan. Hensley's argument revolves on two sentences in Laney's report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9812 - 2017-09-19
professionals, Drs. John Laney and Gary Cowan. Hensley's argument revolves on two sentences in Laney's report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9812 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark R. Anderson
According to Hanson’s testimony, she works for Dr. Stephen A. Cullinan of Health Professionals Limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20383 - 2005-11-22
According to Hanson’s testimony, she works for Dr. Stephen A. Cullinan of Health Professionals Limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20383 - 2005-11-22
COURT OF APPEALS
in Warwick, Rhode Island via a transition plan implemented by Dr. Gary Kendziorski. August 20, 2008 – Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42978 - 2009-11-03
in Warwick, Rhode Island via a transition plan implemented by Dr. Gary Kendziorski. August 20, 2008 – Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42978 - 2009-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
evaluation and ultimately received reports from Dr. Donna Minter and Dr. John Laney. Although both experts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38341 - 2009-07-27
evaluation and ultimately received reports from Dr. Donna Minter and Dr. John Laney. Although both experts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38341 - 2009-07-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
The parties jointly retained Dr. William Taylor to value their family auto business. Dr. Taylor initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54516 - 2014-09-15
The parties jointly retained Dr. William Taylor to value their family auto business. Dr. Taylor initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54516 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as to the incident. She was a witness No. 2015AP191-CR 9 to the incident. We had the testimony of Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161800 - 2017-09-21
as to the incident. She was a witness No. 2015AP191-CR 9 to the incident. We had the testimony of Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161800 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles R. C.
that any expert would rebut that testimony. The defense expert, Dr. Phillip Esplin, apparently opined 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6975 - 2017-09-20
that any expert would rebut that testimony. The defense expert, Dr. Phillip Esplin, apparently opined 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6975 - 2017-09-20
Seidel Tanning Corporation v. City of Milwaukee
is inappropriate, finding: “The plaintiff’s own expert, Dr. Christiansen, said that what we have here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16035 - 2005-03-31
is inappropriate, finding: “The plaintiff’s own expert, Dr. Christiansen, said that what we have here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16035 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brief of Amicus Curiae (Concerned Voters)
The examples used in this brief include demonstration maps created by amicus Dr. Don Leake. More examples
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefamicuscuriaeconcernvoters.pdf - 2022-01-06
The examples used in this brief include demonstration maps created by amicus Dr. Don Leake. More examples
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefamicuscuriaeconcernvoters.pdf - 2022-01-06