Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3761 - 3770 of 6391 for dr.
Search results 3761 - 3770 of 6391 for dr.
State v. David A. B.
. On the same day, June 6, the court ordered that Dr. Rick Beebe conduct a psychological examination of David
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9923 - 2005-03-31
. On the same day, June 6, the court ordered that Dr. Rick Beebe conduct a psychological examination of David
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9923 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David A. B.
, the court ordered that Dr. Rick Beebe conduct a psychological examination of David. The examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9923 - 2017-09-19
, the court ordered that Dr. Rick Beebe conduct a psychological examination of David. The examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9923 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
Several witnesses testified at the hearing after remand. Dr. Amy Otis-Wilbourn, a professor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38808 - 2014-09-15
Several witnesses testified at the hearing after remand. Dr. Amy Otis-Wilbourn, a professor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38808 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
The parties jointly retained Dr. William Taylor to value their family auto business. Dr. Taylor initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54516 - 2014-09-15
The parties jointly retained Dr. William Taylor to value their family auto business. Dr. Taylor initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54516 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Charles R. C.
that any expert would rebut that testimony. The defense expert, Dr. Phillip Esplin, apparently opined 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6975 - 2017-09-20
that any expert would rebut that testimony. The defense expert, Dr. Phillip Esplin, apparently opined 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6975 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as to the incident. She was a witness No. 2015AP191-CR 9 to the incident. We had the testimony of Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161800 - 2017-09-21
as to the incident. She was a witness No. 2015AP191-CR 9 to the incident. We had the testimony of Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161800 - 2017-09-21
Seidel Tanning Corporation v. City of Milwaukee
is inappropriate, finding: “The plaintiff’s own expert, Dr. Christiansen, said that what we have here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16035 - 2005-03-31
is inappropriate, finding: “The plaintiff’s own expert, Dr. Christiansen, said that what we have here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16035 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
The evaluating psychologist, Dr. Deborah L. Collins, submitted a report opining to a reasonable degree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165107 - 2017-09-21
The evaluating psychologist, Dr. Deborah L. Collins, submitted a report opining to a reasonable degree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165107 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
evaluation and ultimately received reports from Dr. Donna Minter and Dr. John Laney. Although both experts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38341 - 2009-07-27
evaluation and ultimately received reports from Dr. Donna Minter and Dr. John Laney. Although both experts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38341 - 2009-07-27
[PDF]
Brief of Amicus Curiae (Concerned Voters)
The examples used in this brief include demonstration maps created by amicus Dr. Don Leake. More examples
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefamicuscuriaeconcernvoters.pdf - 2022-01-06
The examples used in this brief include demonstration maps created by amicus Dr. Don Leake. More examples
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefamicuscuriaeconcernvoters.pdf - 2022-01-06