Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3761 - 3770 of 73705 for ha.

[PDF] Telemark Development, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
affirmed the commission’s decision.2 I. Standard of Review As has become commonplace in administrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13194 - 2017-09-21

State v. Leonard T. Collins
has been previously convicted of two or more “serious felonies.” Upon conviction for the third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4299 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Leonard T. Collins
may charge a defendant as a “persistent repeater” if he or she has been previously convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4299 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 127
must demonstrate that “there has been a determination that but for the provision of such services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33490 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is not a denial of due process for an insanity acquittee who has committed a criminal act to be confined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242489 - 2019-06-20

State v. Mario V. Whitney
of a witness’s testimony and not others where the witness has given inconsistent testimonies. A jury does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4449 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
this language, our supreme court has developed a rule that the state ‘cannot be sued without its consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868979 - 2024-10-29

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
(2), STATS., for terminating Rosemary’s parental rights: Question 1: Has [child’s name] been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15829 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Rosemary S.A.
(2), STATS., for terminating Rosemary’s parental rights: Question 1: Has [child’s name] been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15826 - 2017-09-21

Telemark Development, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
of Review As has become commonplace in administrative review proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13194 - 2005-03-31