Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3761 - 3770 of 50070 for our.
Search results 3761 - 3770 of 50070 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial would have been different. A reasonable probability is one that undermines our confidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46435 - 2010-02-01
of the trial would have been different. A reasonable probability is one that undermines our confidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46435 - 2010-02-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court properly exercised its sentencing discretion. With regard to Siller’s guilty pleas, our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023117 - 2025-10-14
the circuit court properly exercised its sentencing discretion. With regard to Siller’s guilty pleas, our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023117 - 2025-10-14
CA Blank Order
in accepting Darrah’s pleas. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire and waiver of rights
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104336 - 2013-11-11
in accepting Darrah’s pleas. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire and waiver of rights
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104336 - 2013-11-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or that fail to adhere to our briefing standards. See State v. Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d 627, 646-47, 492 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165192 - 2017-09-21
or that fail to adhere to our briefing standards. See State v. Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d 627, 646-47, 492 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165192 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Xiong’s convictions. When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we may not substitute our judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192147 - 2017-09-21
Xiong’s convictions. When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we may not substitute our judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192147 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court properly exercised its sentencing discretion. With regard to Siller’s guilty pleas, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023117 - 2025-10-14
the circuit court properly exercised its sentencing discretion. With regard to Siller’s guilty pleas, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023117 - 2025-10-14
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
it is unlawful. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882215 - 2024-11-27
it is unlawful. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882215 - 2024-11-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
to consider our prior decision as the law of the case, and instead rejected those issues on their merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32894 - 2014-09-15
to consider our prior decision as the law of the case, and instead rejected those issues on their merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32894 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with appellate counsel that these issues do not have arguable merit for appeal. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213862 - 2018-06-06
with appellate counsel that these issues do not have arguable merit for appeal. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213862 - 2018-06-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit report and our independent 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191275 - 2017-09-21
consideration of the no-merit report and our independent 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191275 - 2017-09-21