Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3761 - 3770 of 49879 for our.
Search results 3761 - 3770 of 49879 for our.
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Delao
be frivolous. Attorney Skemp concludes that these possible issues have no arguable merit. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9158 - 2017-09-19
be frivolous. Attorney Skemp concludes that these possible issues have no arguable merit. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9158 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
exercise of its sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98002 - 2013-06-06
exercise of its sentencing discretion must overcome our presumption that the sentence was reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98002 - 2013-06-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel’s representation at sentencing. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011148 - 2025-09-18
counsel’s representation at sentencing. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011148 - 2025-09-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel’s representation at sentencing. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011148 - 2025-09-18
counsel’s representation at sentencing. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011148 - 2025-09-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the jury “unless
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221849 - 2018-10-17
reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the jury “unless
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221849 - 2018-10-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
convictions. When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we may not substitute our judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654556 - 2023-05-10
convictions. When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we may not substitute our judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654556 - 2023-05-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725984 - 2023-11-07
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725984 - 2023-11-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524813 - 2022-05-24
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524813 - 2022-05-24
CA Blank Order
of his 1996 conviction is appropriate. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100891 - 2013-08-19
of his 1996 conviction is appropriate. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100891 - 2013-08-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Baggett was sent a copy of the no-merit report but has not filed a response. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207234 - 2018-01-17
. Baggett was sent a copy of the no-merit report but has not filed a response. Upon our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207234 - 2018-01-17