Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37601 - 37610 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 37601 - 37610 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Highland Manor Associates v. Michele Bast
for reconsideration after a trial to the court. It allows a party to move a court to amend its findings, conclusions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16680 - 2005-03-31
for reconsideration after a trial to the court. It allows a party to move a court to amend its findings, conclusions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16680 - 2005-03-31
William W. Welter v. City of Milwaukee
. FINE, J. The City of Milwaukee appeals from the trial court's entry of summary judgment declaring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11483 - 2005-03-31
. FINE, J. The City of Milwaukee appeals from the trial court's entry of summary judgment declaring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11483 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Highland Manor Associates v. Michele Bast
creates a procedure for a new trial in an eviction action, provides an adequate remedy for a defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16680 - 2017-09-21
creates a procedure for a new trial in an eviction action, provides an adequate remedy for a defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16680 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
reverse the trial court’s decision for the reasons discussed below and remand the matter for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39396 - 2014-09-15
reverse the trial court’s decision for the reasons discussed below and remand the matter for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39396 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Randall Lemke v. George Arrowood
, and rescission of the contract. At trial, Arrowood also argued that Lemke had breached the contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15612 - 2017-09-21
, and rescission of the contract. At trial, Arrowood also argued that Lemke had breached the contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15612 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mary H.
the conditions for her children’s return. She also asserts that her trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2183 - 2005-03-31
the conditions for her children’s return. She also asserts that her trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2183 - 2005-03-31
Martin Mellenthin v. Rodney Berger
).[1] We conclude that the trial court erred in its analysis of Durand Rural’s classification. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5685 - 2005-03-31
).[1] We conclude that the trial court erred in its analysis of Durand Rural’s classification. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5685 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marquis O. Gilliam
. We conclude the trial court’s finding that defense counsel failed to establish that Hagen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15512 - 2005-03-31
. We conclude the trial court’s finding that defense counsel failed to establish that Hagen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15512 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ronald Waites v. Gary R. McCaughtry
and 303.20, respectively. The trial court determined that reversal was required because No. 95-1550
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9153 - 2017-09-19
and 303.20, respectively. The trial court determined that reversal was required because No. 95-1550
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9153 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Angela M. Peabody v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
dated January 17, 1997. Because the trial court based its decision on a policy exclusion not relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13078 - 2017-09-21
dated January 17, 1997. Because the trial court based its decision on a policy exclusion not relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13078 - 2017-09-21