Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37631 - 37640 of 64042 for records/1000.

State v. Michael G. Kinch
whereby the facts of record and the law relied upon are stated and are considered together for the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9976 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable. There is no evidence in the record to suggest Schmidt’s efforts were not reasonable. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33449 - 2008-07-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206143 - 2017-12-27

COURT OF APPEALS
not appear to have been included in the appellate record. Because the judgments are official court documents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29449 - 2007-06-20

COURT OF APPEALS
was not knowingly and voluntarily made. He asserts that the court should have assumed non-waiver and the record did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29179 - 2007-05-23

[PDF] Green Lake State Bank v. Price Court, LLC
; it independently evaluated the evidence of fair value placed on the record. We conclude that the sale price did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25486 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that ultimately led to the convictions. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316784 - 2020-12-23

[PDF] John M. O'Neill v. Indian Hills First Addition Association, Inc.
on the appropriate legal principles and facts of record.” Id. (quoted source omitted). In determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13270 - 2017-09-21

State v. Mark S. Witkowski
retain certain records of licensed drivers. Witkowski constructs an argument that the information is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8641 - 2005-03-31

State v. William Gunderson
). ¶12 We have examined the record to determine whether the circuit court violated a substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4983 - 2005-03-31