Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37651 - 37660 of 75032 for judgment for us.

COURT OF APPEALS
by using three actuarial instruments. She testified that the instruments assess a subject’s likelihood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104459 - 2013-11-18

[PDF] Malvern Sullivan v. Waukesha County
family, and he had no reason to take his life. Sullivan essentially asks us to independently evaluate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15812 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with “extension of a commitment,” and the terms will therefore be used interchangeably. See Sheboygan County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607616 - 2023-01-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
acts. Marsh then explained that she assessed Wilson’s risk of reoffending in the future by using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104459 - 2017-09-21

State v. Martin Anthony Azevedo
the PBT result to be used as evidence supporting the officer’s decision to arrest Azevedo. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4695 - 2005-03-31

Malvern Sullivan v. Waukesha County
asks us to independently evaluate the facts and draw our own inferences from them. ¶7 We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15812 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
been “[l]ed astray by the Town of Pacific’s briefs,” and faults us for “start[ing] down the wrong road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40081 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
and Poblocki Paving Corporation, Defendants. APPEAL from judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85378 - 2012-07-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS. No. 2010AP2392 2 APPEAL from judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85378 - 2014-09-15

2008 WI APP 127
to as screeners, for use in determining applicants’ functional eligibility to participate in the program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33490 - 2011-06-14