Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37661 - 37670 of 63312 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 37661 - 37670 of 63312 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Gustavo Hinojosa
) (1997-98).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14582 - 2005-03-31
) (1997-98).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14582 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in part and denying in part its motion to admit other-acts evidence. The State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896228 - 2025-01-02
in part and denying in part its motion to admit other-acts evidence. The State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896228 - 2025-01-02
[PDF]
the motion to dismiss should be granted to further the orderly administration of No. 2024AP1673 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=978002 - 2025-07-01
the motion to dismiss should be granted to further the orderly administration of No. 2024AP1673 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=978002 - 2025-07-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) proceedings for each child, held in 2019 and 2020. ¶3 Also in July 2021, the County filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590933 - 2022-11-28
) proceedings for each child, held in 2019 and 2020. ¶3 Also in July 2021, the County filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590933 - 2022-11-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in part and denying in part its motion to admit other-acts evidence. The State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912744 - 2025-02-19
in part and denying in part its motion to admit other-acts evidence. The State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912744 - 2025-02-19
COURT OF APPEALS
)[2] postconviction motion in which he argues that postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29129 - 2007-05-21
)[2] postconviction motion in which he argues that postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29129 - 2007-05-21
[PDF]
State v. Gustavo Hinojosa
from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues: (1) that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14582 - 2017-09-21
from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues: (1) that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14582 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Blankenship’s motion to suppress evidence 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872665 - 2024-11-07
Blankenship’s motion to suppress evidence 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872665 - 2024-11-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
addressed the State’s motion for sanctions. L.C. appeared with counsel, who explained to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275831 - 2020-08-04
addressed the State’s motion for sanctions. L.C. appeared with counsel, who explained to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275831 - 2020-08-04
[PDF]
WI APP 70
asserts that he also appeals the circuit court’s “denial of his Motion to Reconsider.” The motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113099 - 2017-09-21
asserts that he also appeals the circuit court’s “denial of his Motion to Reconsider.” The motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113099 - 2017-09-21