Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37661 - 37670 of 63304 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 37661 - 37670 of 63304 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
, as well as the order denying Roach’s postconviction motion. He contends the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82636 - 2009-11-04
, as well as the order denying Roach’s postconviction motion. He contends the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82636 - 2009-11-04
[MS WORD]
FA-4108V: Petition with Minor Children
en blanco; el secretario del tribunal lo anotara. This form does not replace the need for an
/formdisplay/FA-4108V_es.doc?formNumber=FA-4108V&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=es - 2024-08-15
en blanco; el secretario del tribunal lo anotara. This form does not replace the need for an
/formdisplay/FA-4108V_es.doc?formNumber=FA-4108V&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=es - 2024-08-15
[PDF]
, 2016AP897-CR; added oral argument dates for September 2018
? Whether the allegations of a defendant’s § 974.06 motion were sufficient to require a new trial
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213608 - 2018-05-29
? Whether the allegations of a defendant’s § 974.06 motion were sufficient to require a new trial
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213608 - 2018-05-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in part and denying in part its motion to admit other-acts evidence. The State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896228 - 2025-01-02
in part and denying in part its motion to admit other-acts evidence. The State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896228 - 2025-01-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Blankenship’s motion to suppress evidence 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872665 - 2024-11-07
Blankenship’s motion to suppress evidence 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872665 - 2024-11-07
COURT OF APPEALS
)[2] postconviction motion in which he argues that postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29129 - 2007-05-21
)[2] postconviction motion in which he argues that postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29129 - 2007-05-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) proceedings for each child, held in 2019 and 2020. ¶3 Also in July 2021, the County filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590933 - 2022-11-28
) proceedings for each child, held in 2019 and 2020. ¶3 Also in July 2021, the County filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590933 - 2022-11-28
[PDF]
Clairene D. Hunt v. Clarendon National Insurance Service, Inc.
was “occupying” a “covered auto” at the time of the injury. ¶7 The trial court granted defendants’ motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7192 - 2017-09-20
was “occupying” a “covered auto” at the time of the injury. ¶7 The trial court granted defendants’ motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7192 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and misdemeanor battery. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion.1 ¶2 Robinson argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516374 - 2022-05-03
, and misdemeanor battery. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion.1 ¶2 Robinson argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516374 - 2022-05-03
Nancy Thiede v. Terry Neuman
obligation. The order was entered after Nancy Thiede, Neuman’s former wife, brought a motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12825 - 2005-03-31
obligation. The order was entered after Nancy Thiede, Neuman’s former wife, brought a motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12825 - 2005-03-31