Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37661 - 37670 of 65151 for or b.
Search results 37661 - 37670 of 65151 for or b.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion will not be published. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4. AppealNo AddtlCap
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93763 - 2014-09-15
. This opinion will not be published. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4. AppealNo AddtlCap
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93763 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
809.23(1)(b)5. [1] The assaults against Y.C. were alleged to have occurred between January 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35411 - 2009-02-03
809.23(1)(b)5. [1] The assaults against Y.C. were alleged to have occurred between January 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35411 - 2009-02-03
George H. v. Nancy Fennema
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] George's application for a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9742 - 2005-03-31
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] George's application for a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9742 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184756 - 2017-09-21
.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184756 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark Conners
.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2264 - 2017-09-19
.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2264 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Janice Johnson Kuhn v. Fitzgerald
remanded with directions. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15432 - 2017-09-21
remanded with directions. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15432 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Medford, WI 54451 Nancy B. Miller Miller Law Office P. O. Box 675 River Falls, WI 54022-0675
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118670 - 2014-09-15
Medford, WI 54451 Nancy B. Miller Miller Law Office P. O. Box 675 River Falls, WI 54022-0675
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118670 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court aptly explained in a prior iteration of this litigation, “[b]ased on the record, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948761 - 2025-04-29
court aptly explained in a prior iteration of this litigation, “[b]ased on the record, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948761 - 2025-04-29
State v. Craig C. Hill
)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. "We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9553 - 2005-03-31
)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. "We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9553 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.b. Our review of the record reveals that there is no meritorious basis to challenge either
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191024 - 2017-09-21
.b. Our review of the record reveals that there is no meritorious basis to challenge either
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191024 - 2017-09-21