Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3771 - 3780 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 3771 - 3780 of 58492 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel, that the prosecutor made improper and prejudical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32195 - 2008-03-25
was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel, that the prosecutor made improper and prejudical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32195 - 2008-03-25
[PDF]
Michael A. Yamat v. Verma L. B.
. Yamat argues that the trial No. 96-2313 2 court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11258 - 2017-09-19
. Yamat argues that the trial No. 96-2313 2 court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11258 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and from an order denying postconviction relief. Jackson argues that he is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94724 - 2014-09-15
, and from an order denying postconviction relief. Jackson argues that he is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94724 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
CURLEY, P.J. Eric Paul Henry appeals the judgment, entered following a jury trial, convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49601 - 2010-05-03
CURLEY, P.J. Eric Paul Henry appeals the judgment, entered following a jury trial, convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49601 - 2010-05-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
—argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by: (1) denying the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110320 - 2017-09-21
—argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by: (1) denying the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110320 - 2017-09-21
State v. Sammy J. Dickey
because he did not get an “adequate and meaningful” remand hearing given that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5359 - 2005-03-31
because he did not get an “adequate and meaningful” remand hearing given that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5359 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Pablo Parrilla
(1) (2001-02). 1 Parrilla contends: (1) that he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25829 - 2017-09-21
(1) (2001-02). 1 Parrilla contends: (1) that he received ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25829 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bruce W. Ackerman
. § 940.225(3m). He contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2650 - 2005-03-31
. § 940.225(3m). He contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2650 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bruce W. Ackerman
. STAT. § 940.225(3m). He contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2650 - 2017-09-19
. STAT. § 940.225(3m). He contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2650 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-degree recklessly endangering safety. Both convictions were entered following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242615 - 2019-06-25
-degree recklessly endangering safety. Both convictions were entered following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242615 - 2019-06-25