Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3771 - 3780 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 3771 - 3780 of 58285 for speedy trial.
State v. John T. Shaw
., Myse, P.J., and Hoover, J. CANE, C.J. After a nonjury trial, John Shaw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14025 - 2005-03-31
., Myse, P.J., and Hoover, J. CANE, C.J. After a nonjury trial, John Shaw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14025 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 8, 2005 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
that the trial court lost competency to proceed when mandatory statutory time limits were not met, which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20175 - 2007-01-24
that the trial court lost competency to proceed when mandatory statutory time limits were not met, which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20175 - 2007-01-24
[PDF]
State v. John T. Shaw
., Myse, P.J., and Hoover, J. CANE, C.J. After a nonjury trial, John Shaw appeals two orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14025 - 2014-09-15
., Myse, P.J., and Hoover, J. CANE, C.J. After a nonjury trial, John Shaw appeals two orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14025 - 2014-09-15
State v. Samuel Joseph Cole
for resentencing. Cole contends he is entitled to resentencing because his trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19096 - 2005-07-25
for resentencing. Cole contends he is entitled to resentencing because his trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19096 - 2005-07-25
[PDF]
State v. Samuel Joseph Cole
denying his motion for resentencing. Cole contends he is entitled to resentencing because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19096 - 2017-09-21
denying his motion for resentencing. Cole contends he is entitled to resentencing because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19096 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
). No. 2005AP1087 2 He contends that the trial court lost competency to proceed when mandatory statutory time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20175 - 2014-09-15
). No. 2005AP1087 2 He contends that the trial court lost competency to proceed when mandatory statutory time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20175 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Douglas Needham v. Leila Bailie
Elmer No. 97-3007 2 Needham’s will. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13142 - 2017-09-21
Elmer No. 97-3007 2 Needham’s will. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13142 - 2017-09-21
Laura Roberson v. Donald Jessup
accumulated in front of Jessup's apartment building. On June 29, 1993, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9327 - 2005-03-31
accumulated in front of Jessup's apartment building. On June 29, 1993, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9327 - 2005-03-31
Douglas Needham v. Leila Bailie
will. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court properly found that the will was not forged; (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13142 - 2005-03-31
will. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court properly found that the will was not forged; (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13142 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43834 - 2009-11-23
for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43834 - 2009-11-23