Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3771 - 3780 of 5316 for text.

[PDF] Drug court practitioner fact sheet: Urine drug concentrations -- The scientific rationale for eliminating the use of drug test levels in drug court proceedings
and false questions based on the Fact Sheet text. 1. Urine drug levels are similar to blood alcohol
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/urinedrugoncentrations.pdf - 2021-09-23

[PDF] Supporting memo for Supreme Court rule petition 16-02
sufficient guidance within the text of the rule. In response, the committee considered several options
/supreme/docs/1602petitionsupport.pdf - 2016-04-20

[PDF] Rules petition 04-08
not addressed in this petition,” follow the text of the proposed amendments. The proposed amendments
/supreme/docs/0408petition.pdf - 2010-01-20

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - November 2011
, effective July 1, 2007. With the exceptions of SCR 20:7.1 and SCR 20:7.5, the text of all rules at issue
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72927 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, A.B. texted to say that she would be going to Grey’s house after work to discuss the establishment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033536 - 2025-11-06

John J. Droegkamp v. James F. Langdon
of loss of use were dicta. Furthermore, it is not clear from the text of the two cases whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6009 - 2005-03-31

WI App 50 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2008 Complete Title of...
in the text reasons supporting our conclusion that the Commission applied a reasonable interpretation of Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79860 - 2012-04-24

State v. Kevin D. Jennings
). These comments were prepared as an aid for "arriving at a full understanding of the text of the law. They [were
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16481 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Wisconsin Electric Power Company v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. § 102.03(1)(f) since the amendment in 1949, discussed later in the text, include: CBS, Inc. v. LIRC, 219
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17306 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Ronald W. Coutts, Sr. v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
by considering the words of the statute. If the statutory text is clear and unambiguous on its face, we need
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17034 - 2017-09-21