Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37701 - 37710 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 37701 - 37710 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Richard Herbert Voigt v. City of Merrill
a motion for summary judgment arguing that it was immune from liability under § 893.80(4). The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4304 - 2005-03-31
a motion for summary judgment arguing that it was immune from liability under § 893.80(4). The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4304 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
offense) on his no contest plea. On appeal, he challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142368 - 2015-05-26
offense) on his no contest plea. On appeal, he challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142368 - 2015-05-26
Joseph N. Francis v. Maureen M. Francis
modification motion also asked the court to fashion a mechanism for automatically adjusting maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16109 - 2005-03-31
modification motion also asked the court to fashion a mechanism for automatically adjusting maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16109 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, supporting its motion with an affidavit from one of its directors, referencing attached documents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181984 - 2017-09-21
, supporting its motion with an affidavit from one of its directors, referencing attached documents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181984 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
prejudice upon the State’s motion. The present criminal case (with 8 counts) was filed in February 2023
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
prejudice upon the State’s motion. The present criminal case (with 8 counts) was filed in February 2023
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the stop. Eggebrecht filed a motion to suppress, asserting that the traffic stop was unlawful because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001019 - 2025-08-26
the stop. Eggebrecht filed a motion to suppress, asserting that the traffic stop was unlawful because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001019 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stop of her vehicle and, therefore, the circuit court erred in denying her motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78071 - 2014-09-15
stop of her vehicle and, therefore, the circuit court erred in denying her motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78071 - 2014-09-15
State v. Derrick Wilder
unlawfully stopped him and searched him for weapons. The trial court denied his motion to suppress.[1] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10563 - 2005-03-31
unlawfully stopped him and searched him for weapons. The trial court denied his motion to suppress.[1] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10563 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a motion for plea withdrawal based on Ellis’s claim that his trial counsel promised him that his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841736 - 2024-08-27
to a motion for plea withdrawal based on Ellis’s claim that his trial counsel promised him that his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841736 - 2024-08-27
State v. Jeffrey G. Workman
that the circuit court erred by denying his suppression motion. According to Workman, the officer lacked probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4855 - 2005-03-31
that the circuit court erred by denying his suppression motion. According to Workman, the officer lacked probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4855 - 2005-03-31