Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37701 - 37710 of 39104 for c's.
Search results 37701 - 37710 of 39104 for c's.
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the basis for its first decision was erroneous: “[C]ontrary to [this court’s] earlier summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30345 - 2014-09-15
that the basis for its first decision was erroneous: “[C]ontrary to [this court’s] earlier summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30345 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2019-20). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563505 - 2022-09-09
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2019-20). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563505 - 2022-09-09
[PDF]
State v. Kent Kleven
to WIS. STAT. § 973.01(2)(c) and … the penalty enhancer cannot be bifurcated.” Jackson, 270 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7143 - 2017-09-20
to WIS. STAT. § 973.01(2)(c) and … the penalty enhancer cannot be bifurcated.” Jackson, 270 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7143 - 2017-09-20
State v. Jimmie R.R.
and visual or audio distortion. (c) That the child’s statement was made upon oath or affirmation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5438 - 2005-03-31
and visual or audio distortion. (c) That the child’s statement was made upon oath or affirmation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5438 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of sixteen, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) (2005-06) (Count 2). Both were Class C felonies. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103083 - 2013-10-14
of sixteen, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) (2005-06) (Count 2). Both were Class C felonies. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103083 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
State v. Shawnetta M. J.
., our supreme court explicitly recognized that “[c]ase law supports the conclusion that lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26271 - 2017-09-21
., our supreme court explicitly recognized that “[c]ase law supports the conclusion that lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26271 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David Wilson
of the accused to testify.” See Johnson, 121 Wis.2d at 246, 358 N.W.2d at 828. C. Denial of Wilson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12456 - 2017-09-21
of the accused to testify.” See Johnson, 121 Wis.2d at 246, 358 N.W.2d at 828. C. Denial of Wilson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12456 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Roberta Jo W. v. Leroy W.
) was first introduced as 1979 Wis. Act c. 196, § 28. In its analysis, the Legislative Reference Bureau
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17158 - 2017-09-21
) was first introduced as 1979 Wis. Act c. 196, § 28. In its analysis, the Legislative Reference Bureau
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17158 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 122
was submitted on the briefs of Lorraine C. Stoltzfus, assistant attorney general, and J.B. Van Hollen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101688 - 2017-09-21
was submitted on the briefs of Lorraine C. Stoltzfus, assistant attorney general, and J.B. Van Hollen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101688 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gerald J. Van Camp
the crime charged. (c) Address the defendant personally and advise the defendant as follows: 'If you
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17095 - 2017-09-21
the crime charged. (c) Address the defendant personally and advise the defendant as follows: 'If you
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17095 - 2017-09-21