Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37701 - 37710 of 83278 for case search.
Search results 37701 - 37710 of 83278 for case search.
State v. Tyran N. Anderson
the case until the afternoon. When the proceedings reconvened, the case was presented to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2684 - 2005-03-31
the case until the afternoon. When the proceedings reconvened, the case was presented to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2684 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
by failing to convey an offer from the State to resolve the case short of trial. Because the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50001 - 2010-05-17
by failing to convey an offer from the State to resolve the case short of trial. Because the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50001 - 2010-05-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117960 - 2014-09-15
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117960 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
case,” and thus, “remains within the trial court’s discretion.” Id. at 740. ¶5 Immediately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42188 - 2009-10-13
case,” and thus, “remains within the trial court’s discretion.” Id. at 740. ¶5 Immediately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42188 - 2009-10-13
[PDF]
Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan) v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8567 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8567 - 2017-09-19
State v. Parish M. Golden
to counter the State’s claim that this was an open and shut case. Further, at the time of opening statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2432 - 2005-03-31
to counter the State’s claim that this was an open and shut case. Further, at the time of opening statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2432 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Melvin Reed v. Andrew Automotive Group
or No. 98-2200 2 abused its discretion by granting summary judgment, dismissing appellants[’] case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14339 - 2014-09-15
or No. 98-2200 2 abused its discretion by granting summary judgment, dismissing appellants[’] case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14339 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
convicting him of attempted first-degree intentional homicide as a repeater. The sole issue in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264671 - 2020-06-17
convicting him of attempted first-degree intentional homicide as a repeater. The sole issue in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264671 - 2020-06-17
COURT OF APPEALS
this unjust enrichment action. Concluding that this essentially was a case of “rob[bing] Peter to pay Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86527 - 2012-08-28
this unjust enrichment action. Concluding that this essentially was a case of “rob[bing] Peter to pay Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86527 - 2012-08-28
State v. Sheryl D. Stuckey
, 1994, and January 31, 1995.[4] The instant case involves a charge of operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12850 - 2005-03-31
, 1994, and January 31, 1995.[4] The instant case involves a charge of operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12850 - 2005-03-31