Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37721 - 37730 of 83330 for simple case search.
Search results 37721 - 37730 of 83330 for simple case search.
State v. Paul E. Kimmes
v. Smith, 122 Wis.2d 431, 434, 362 N.W.2d 439, 441 (Ct. App. 1984), a case with identical facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13129 - 2005-03-31
v. Smith, 122 Wis.2d 431, 434, 362 N.W.2d 439, 441 (Ct. App. 1984), a case with identical facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13129 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
County circuit court case No. 2012GN16, the subject of Kevin K. v. Advocacy Programs, No. 2012AP1969-FT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99393 - 2014-09-15
County circuit court case No. 2012GN16, the subject of Kevin K. v. Advocacy Programs, No. 2012AP1969-FT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99393 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
for judicial review of an administrative decision by the DNR, which were consolidated into one case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31482 - 2014-09-15
for judicial review of an administrative decision by the DNR, which were consolidated into one case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31482 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Joiner, though all of the defendants in that case were ultimately dismissed. ¶3 In August 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103484 - 2013-10-28
Joiner, though all of the defendants in that case were ultimately dismissed. ¶3 In August 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103484 - 2013-10-28
Arlene Arnold v. David Arnold
2004 WI App 62 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-1547 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6578 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI App 62 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-1547 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6578 - 2005-03-31
Ellen Marie Fischer v. Michael Peter Fischer
), including para. (k): “Such other factors as the court may in each individual case determine to be relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16012 - 2005-03-31
), including para. (k): “Such other factors as the court may in each individual case determine to be relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16012 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
prosecutor. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=960409 - 2025-05-28
prosecutor. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=960409 - 2025-05-28
COURT OF APPEALS
of the judgment. The facts of this case do not fit within the narrow exception to the general rule that a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31307 - 2007-12-26
of the judgment. The facts of this case do not fit within the narrow exception to the general rule that a circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31307 - 2007-12-26
State v. John Edward Kraemer
the State’s case depended on testimonial evidence. At trial, Sandy testified to the following. On several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18188 - 2005-05-16
the State’s case depended on testimonial evidence. At trial, Sandy testified to the following. On several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18188 - 2005-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶8 The easement in this case is an express easement, or an easement created by a written grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79063 - 2012-03-05
. ¶8 The easement in this case is an express easement, or an easement created by a written grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79063 - 2012-03-05