Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37751 - 37760 of 83479 for simple case search.
Search results 37751 - 37760 of 83479 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Jimmie Baldwin
not have been allowed to testify (and who also was convicted in separate cases of crimes relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10125 - 2017-09-19
not have been allowed to testify (and who also was convicted in separate cases of crimes relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10125 - 2017-09-19
Tammy Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.
2006 WI App 85 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP935 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24877 - 2006-05-30
2006 WI App 85 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP935 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24877 - 2006-05-30
Kathleen J. Larson v. Arlita Furlong
it refused to grant a new trial based on newly discovered evidence and when it found the Larsons’ case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11384 - 2005-03-31
it refused to grant a new trial based on newly discovered evidence and when it found the Larsons’ case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11384 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Douglas A. v. Winnebago County
. The family contends that because of the “equities” of the case the alleged other acts or omissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14564 - 2017-09-21
. The family contends that because of the “equities” of the case the alleged other acts or omissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14564 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
nonbinding cases, including two DNA-analysis cases. See id., ¶¶10-16. The court explained, “In each case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117121 - 2014-07-14
nonbinding cases, including two DNA-analysis cases. See id., ¶¶10-16. The court explained, “In each case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117121 - 2014-07-14
State v. Rudy A. Wendt
and affirm the judgment. The State’s case against Wendt was based on allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13020 - 2005-03-31
and affirm the judgment. The State’s case against Wendt was based on allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13020 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Roy D. Townsend
jumping.2 He claims that a condition of release imposed in each of two prior cases, the violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10825 - 2017-09-20
jumping.2 He claims that a condition of release imposed in each of two prior cases, the violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10825 - 2017-09-20
State v. John Edward Kraemer
the State’s case depended on testimonial evidence. At trial, Sandy testified to the following. On several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18188 - 2005-05-16
the State’s case depended on testimonial evidence. At trial, Sandy testified to the following. On several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18188 - 2005-05-16
[PDF]
WI 101
2012 WI 101 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2011AP2736-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85146 - 2014-09-15
2012 WI 101 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2011AP2736-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85146 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Shelbie Sue Schultz
. Additionally, she argues that this has prejudiced No. 97-1265-CR 5 her case because had she been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12429 - 2017-09-21
. Additionally, she argues that this has prejudiced No. 97-1265-CR 5 her case because had she been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12429 - 2017-09-21