Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37761 - 37770 of 57351 for id.
Search results 37761 - 37770 of 57351 for id.
[PDF]
WI 9
.’” Id. (quoting former SCR 20:8.4(b)). Consequently, we concluded that Attorney Brandt had violated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=937389 - 2025-04-08
.’” Id. (quoting former SCR 20:8.4(b)). Consequently, we concluded that Attorney Brandt had violated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=937389 - 2025-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS
unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. Factual findings are clearly erroneous only where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34126 - 2008-10-08
unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. Factual findings are clearly erroneous only where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34126 - 2008-10-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
and that the deficiency prejudiced the defense. Id. To prove deficient performance, the defendant must show specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27895 - 2007-01-22
and that the deficiency prejudiced the defense. Id. To prove deficient performance, the defendant must show specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27895 - 2007-01-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
that counsel’s performance was deficient and that the deficiency prejudiced the defense. Id. To prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27895 - 2014-09-15
that counsel’s performance was deficient and that the deficiency prejudiced the defense. Id. To prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27895 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 9
no services of commensurate value . . . ." Id. at 211. The court found the large sums taken by Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60079 - 2014-09-15
no services of commensurate value . . . ." Id. at 211. The court found the large sums taken by Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60079 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James Lee Harris v. David H. Schwarz
and a subsequent final revocation hearing. Id. At the preliminary hearing, the sole inquiry is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10806 - 2017-09-20
and a subsequent final revocation hearing. Id. At the preliminary hearing, the sole inquiry is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10806 - 2017-09-20
State v. Alfonso Taylor
and inadvertent confrontations between a shackled accused and one or more members of the jury [occurs],” id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5437 - 2005-03-31
and inadvertent confrontations between a shackled accused and one or more members of the jury [occurs],” id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5437 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Myers
Law enforcement may designate one of those two as its primary test. Id. Once a person consents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9006 - 2017-09-19
Law enforcement may designate one of those two as its primary test. Id. Once a person consents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9006 - 2017-09-19
State v. Terry L. Robertson
that ‘the defendant in fact committed the crime charged’ is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2309 - 2005-03-31
that ‘the defendant in fact committed the crime charged’ is an erroneous exercise of discretion.” Id. (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2309 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 35
, of a fundamental right. See id. at 319. Here, Feldmann defines the relevant classification as “persons who have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28181 - 2014-09-15
, of a fundamental right. See id. at 319. Here, Feldmann defines the relevant classification as “persons who have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28181 - 2014-09-15