Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37761 - 37770 of 58492 for speedy trial.

State v. Scott T. Bidwell
weapon; therefore, the trial court should not have found him guilty of the dangerous weapon penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8802 - 2005-03-31

Eric W. Kruger v. Christina L. Kruger
and raise Christina’s children. ¶3 At the time of trial, the parties had stipulated to the value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16296 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Superb Video v. County of Kenosha
the regulation. The trial court ruled that the regulation was within the board's authority and duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7884 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Scott T. Bidwell
, the No. 95-0791-CR -2- trial court should not have found him guilty of the dangerous weapon penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8802 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of possession of a firearm by a felon. Nash also appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78236 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Peter D. Grefsheim
of the legal limit of .10%. Before trial, Grefsheim moved to suppress the results of the blood test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14954 - 2017-09-21

Milo S. Couillard v. David H. Schwarz
PER CURIAM. Milo Couillard appeals the trial court’s judgment and order affirming Couillard’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2927 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kenneth R. Schewe
for the claimed ineffective assistance of trial counsel; and (3) resentencing. The circuit court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11695 - 2005-03-31

Jerome J. Hein v. Thomas N. Frieberg
by Frieberg’s minor daughter. They contend the trial court erred in determining that the coverage in the policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3120 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
burdened. ¶10 At a bench trial, the circuit court granted the Meloneys’ motion to dismiss the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261853 - 2020-05-27