Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37781 - 37790 of 74391 for a ha.

COURT OF APPEALS
court has a statutory obligation to establish on the record that the defendant understands, among other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84074 - 2012-06-25

State v. Nicholas S. Cole
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief, the [trial] court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25414 - 2006-06-05

State v. Dianne K.
of such tribe. (Emphasis added.) This court has held that, although “not binding on courts, [the guidelines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6521 - 2005-03-31

Norman Meka v. City of Milwaukee Annuity and Pension Board and Robert G. Nehls
is whether the Board “has acted without a rational basis or the exercise of discretion.” State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8939 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Daniel J. Luedke
to determine whether the defendant has made a prima facie showing that the trial court did not comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3010 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Auston J.S.
for which a juvenile is found delinquent. The placement order has to fit the entire text of WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7665 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the Court has entered the following order: 2016AP1419 State v. Gerald A. Campbell (L.C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193897 - 2017-09-21

State v. Sheryl D. Stuckey
are not persuaded. First, the “Order of Revocation” letter plainly states that it is “Amended,” and the State has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12850 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
during cross-examination.2 DISCUSSION ¶5 “When a jury has questions regarding testimony, ‘the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60569 - 2014-09-15

Barbara J. Walbrink v. American Family Insurance Group
. The determination of whether an insurance company has a duty to defend is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7795 - 2005-03-31