Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37781 - 37790 of 68499 for did.
Search results 37781 - 37790 of 68499 for did.
George T. Stathus v. James H. Horst
and in its award of attorney’s fees. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4990 - 2005-03-31
and in its award of attorney’s fees. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4990 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terrance C. Harris
they would recommend to the judge that he be given a break, and they further threatened him that if he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13602 - 2005-03-31
they would recommend to the judge that he be given a break, and they further threatened him that if he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13602 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the court did not accurately inform him that his plea would result in him losing the right to possess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92889 - 2014-09-15
the court did not accurately inform him that his plea would result in him losing the right to possess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92889 - 2014-09-15
WI App 74 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP896-CR Complete Titl...
assaulted.” No one did. There were pedestrians walking around outside because it was a busy time of day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113963 - 2014-07-29
assaulted.” No one did. There were pedestrians walking around outside because it was a busy time of day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113963 - 2014-07-29
[PDF]
WI APP 96
conviction in the PSI and at sentencing. The circuit court denied the motion, holding that the court “did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155665 - 2017-09-21
conviction in the PSI and at sentencing. The circuit court denied the motion, holding that the court “did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155665 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.32 (2019-20).1 Aussprung was advised of his right to file a response and did not file a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611498 - 2023-01-18
809.32 (2019-20).1 Aussprung was advised of his right to file a response and did not file a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611498 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Kazanjian
did not invalidate the arraignment on the escape charge or impair the court’s jurisdiction. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15483 - 2017-09-21
did not invalidate the arraignment on the escape charge or impair the court’s jurisdiction. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15483 - 2017-09-21
John P. Haselow v. Grant Gauthier
Gauthier. In the affidavit, Lester claimed that he stated to Piper that he “did not know of Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11842 - 2005-03-31
Gauthier. In the affidavit, Lester claimed that he stated to Piper that he “did not know of Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11842 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
).[1] Echols did not respond. At our request, Attorney Eisendrath filed supplemental materials
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114417 - 2014-06-09
).[1] Echols did not respond. At our request, Attorney Eisendrath filed supplemental materials
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114417 - 2014-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Trial counsel testified that based on his investigator’s report and Fernandez’s observations, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92615 - 2013-02-12
.” Trial counsel testified that based on his investigator’s report and Fernandez’s observations, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92615 - 2013-02-12