Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37781 - 37790 of 55887 for n y c.
Search results 37781 - 37790 of 55887 for n y c.
State v. Jonathon D. Bell
.[9] C. Double Jeopardy ¶34 Bell asserts that his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13998 - 2005-03-31
.[9] C. Double Jeopardy ¶34 Bell asserts that his conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13998 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marvin Prince
with the inked fingerprints bearing the names: Item C - Marvin Prince [A. H.] F/W, D.O.B. 2-21-65 Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12353 - 2005-03-31
with the inked fingerprints bearing the names: Item C - Marvin Prince [A. H.] F/W, D.O.B. 2-21-65 Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12353 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert L. Guck v. Gary McCaughtry
the meaning of the law. Id. at 753 n.4, 543 N.W.2d at 547. And while we quoted Lealiou's criticism
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10028 - 2017-09-19
the meaning of the law. Id. at 753 n.4, 543 N.W.2d at 547. And while we quoted Lealiou's criticism
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10028 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 169
that a waiver of Miranda rights was express.” Id. Rather, “[a]n ‘implicit waiver’ of the ‘right to remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56203 - 2014-09-15
that a waiver of Miranda rights was express.” Id. Rather, “[a]n ‘implicit waiver’ of the ‘right to remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56203 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the defense are questions of law which this court reviews independently.” See id. at 128. “[C]ourts may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209955 - 2018-03-20
to the defense are questions of law which this court reviews independently.” See id. at 128. “[C]ourts may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209955 - 2018-03-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the Honorable Elsa C. Lamelas on February 27, 2006. ¶3 On July 3, 2006, Orville moved to suppress the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33250 - 2014-09-15
to the Honorable Elsa C. Lamelas on February 27, 2006. ¶3 On July 3, 2006, Orville moved to suppress the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33250 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Nathan Lalor
at 439 n.12. The weight to be given the statistics cited by the experts in this case was for the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15368 - 2017-09-21
at 439 n.12. The weight to be given the statistics cited by the experts in this case was for the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15368 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard A. Dodson
.”); Hatcher v. State, 83 Wis. 2d 559, 566-67, 266 N.W.2d 320 (1978). In Doggett, 505 U.S. at 652 n.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4941 - 2005-03-31
.”); Hatcher v. State, 83 Wis. 2d 559, 566-67, 266 N.W.2d 320 (1978). In Doggett, 505 U.S. at 652 n.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4941 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. For all these reasons, this argument fails. C. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel ¶17 “[T]he ‘manifest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=636888 - 2023-03-23
. For all these reasons, this argument fails. C. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel ¶17 “[T]he ‘manifest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=636888 - 2023-03-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. At that point, Durham threw down an object, later identified as a coat, and “c[a]me at” or “[l]unged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169266 - 2017-09-21
. At that point, Durham threw down an object, later identified as a coat, and “c[a]me at” or “[l]unged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169266 - 2017-09-21