Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37791 - 37800 of 62360 for child support.
Search results 37791 - 37800 of 62360 for child support.
State v. David M. Pleau
Nicklaus’s report characterizes him as cooperative, Pleau’s refusal supports a reasonable inference that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7415 - 2005-03-31
Nicklaus’s report characterizes him as cooperative, Pleau’s refusal supports a reasonable inference that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7415 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathan R. Bristol
conduct. In support of his contention, Bristol cites, among others, United States Supreme Court cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16266 - 2005-03-31
conduct. In support of his contention, Bristol cites, among others, United States Supreme Court cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16266 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David M. Pleau
, No. 04-0836-CR 5 Pleau’s refusal supports a reasonable inference that he feared the tests would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7415 - 2017-09-20
, No. 04-0836-CR 5 Pleau’s refusal supports a reasonable inference that he feared the tests would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7415 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
. There need not be a violation of the law to support an investigative stop. State v. Anagnos, 2012 WI 64, ¶47
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102775 - 2013-10-08
. There need not be a violation of the law to support an investigative stop. State v. Anagnos, 2012 WI 64, ¶47
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102775 - 2013-10-08
[PDF]
Sauk County v. Verda C.R.
other specific acts or omissions which supported their conclusion of a substantial probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13327 - 2017-09-21
other specific acts or omissions which supported their conclusion of a substantial probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13327 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
“is indicative of [a] consciousness of guilt” and may be used as evidence to support a finding of probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34330 - 2008-10-15
“is indicative of [a] consciousness of guilt” and may be used as evidence to support a finding of probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34330 - 2008-10-15
Amjad Tufail v. The Furniture Clearance Center (Division of Porter Furniture Center)
)(b). ¶10 Our decision is further supported by the legislature’s express provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6381 - 2005-03-31
)(b). ¶10 Our decision is further supported by the legislature’s express provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6381 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas Hirthe
-jeopardy clause unless evidence is sufficient to support conviction). The evidence here is sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8925 - 2005-03-31
-jeopardy clause unless evidence is sufficient to support conviction). The evidence here is sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8925 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 1, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals...
877. ¶6 On appeal, Meddaugh argues that “fishtailing” is insufficient to support a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81709 - 2012-04-30
877. ¶6 On appeal, Meddaugh argues that “fishtailing” is insufficient to support a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81709 - 2012-04-30
State v. James R. Schiller
, and the record would not support such a finding. b. Improper prosecutorial motive or purpose ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2574 - 2005-03-31
, and the record would not support such a finding. b. Improper prosecutorial motive or purpose ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2574 - 2005-03-31